Benevolent and hostile sexism in a shifting global context

Manuela Barreto, David Matthew Doyle

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The theory of and research on ambivalent sexism — which encompasses both attitudes that are overtly negative (hostile sexism) and those that seem subjectively positive but are actually harmful (benevolent sexism) — have made substantial contributions to understanding how sexism operates and the consequences it has for women. It is now clear that sexism takes different forms, some of which can be disguised as protection and flattery. However, all forms of sexism have negative effects on how women are perceived and treated by others as well as on women themselves. Some of these findings have implications for understanding other social inequalities, such as ableism, ageism, racism and classism. In this Review, we summarize what is known about the predictors of ambivalent sexism and its effects. Although we focus on women, we also consider some effects on men, in particular those that indirectly influence women. Throughout the Review we point to societal shifts that are likely to influence how sexism is manifested, experienced and understood. We conclude by discussing the broader implications of these changes and specifying areas of enquiry that need to be addressed to continue making progress in understanding the mechanisms that underlie social inequalities.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)98-111
Number of pages14
JournalNature reviews psychology
Volume2
Issue number2
Early online date2 Dec 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2023
Externally publishedYes

Cite this