Oxygenation thresholds for invasive ventilation in hypoxemic respiratory failure: a target trial emulation in two cohorts

Christopher J. Yarnell, Federico Angriman, Bruno L. Ferreyro, Kuan Liu, Harm Jan de Grooth, Lisa Burry, Laveena Munshi, Sangeeta Mehta, Leo Celi, Paul Elbers, Patrick Thoral, Laurent Brochard, Hannah Wunsch, Robert A. Fowler, Lillian Sung, George Tomlinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The optimal thresholds for the initiation of invasive ventilation in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure are unknown. Using the saturation-to-inspired oxygen ratio (SF), we compared lower versus higher hypoxemia severity thresholds for initiating invasive ventilation. Methods: This target trial emulation included patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV, 2008–2019) and the Amsterdam University Medical Centers (AmsterdamUMCdb, 2003–2016) databases admitted to intensive care and receiving inspired oxygen fraction ≥ 0.4 via non-rebreather mask, noninvasive ventilation, or high-flow nasal cannula. We compared the effect of using invasive ventilation initiation thresholds of SF < 110, < 98, and < 88 on 28-day mortality. MIMIC-IV was used for the primary analysis and AmsterdamUMCdb for the secondary analysis. We obtained posterior means and 95% credible intervals (CrI) with nonparametric Bayesian G-computation. Results: We studied 3,357 patients in the primary analysis. For invasive ventilation initiation thresholds SF < 110, SF < 98, and SF < 88, the predicted 28-day probabilities of invasive ventilation were 72%, 47%, and 19%. Predicted 28-day mortality was lowest with threshold SF < 110 (22.2%, CrI 19.2 to 25.0), compared to SF < 98 (absolute risk increase 1.6%, CrI 0.6 to 2.6) or SF < 88 (absolute risk increase 3.5%, CrI 1.4 to 5.4). In the secondary analysis (1,279 patients), the predicted 28-day probability of invasive ventilation was 50% for initiation threshold SF < 110, 28% for SF < 98, and 19% for SF < 88. In contrast with the primary analysis, predicted mortality was highest with threshold SF < 110 (14.6%, CrI 7.7 to 22.3), compared to SF < 98 (absolute risk decrease 0.5%, CrI 0.0 to 0.9) or SF < 88 (absolute risk decrease 1.9%, CrI 0.9 to 2.8). Conclusion: Initiating invasive ventilation at lower hypoxemia severity will increase the rate of invasive ventilation, but this can either increase or decrease the expected mortality, with the direction of effect likely depending on baseline mortality risk and clinical context.

Original languageEnglish
Article number67
JournalCritical Care
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2023

Keywords

  • Bayesian analysis
  • Hypoxemic respiratory failure
  • Intensive care medicine
  • Mechanical ventilation
  • Noninvasive ventilation
  • Statistical methods
  • Target trial emulation
  • Thresholds for invasive ventilation

Cite this