Bringing personal perspective elicitation to the heart of shared decision-making: A scoping review

Ester A. Rake, Ivana C.H. Box, Dunja Dreesens, Marjan J. Meinders, Jan A.M. Kremer, Johanna W.M. Aarts, Glyn Elwyn

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Proponents of shared decision-making (SDM) advocate the elicitation of the patient's perspective. This scoping review explores if, and to what extent, the personal perspectives of patients are elicited during a clinical encounter, as part of a SDM process. We define personal perspective elicitation (PPE) as: the disclosure (either elicited by the clinician or spontaneously expressed by the patient) of information related to the patient's personal preferences, values and/or context. Methods: A search was conducted in five literature databases from inception dates up to July 2020, to identify empirical studies about SDM (with/without SDM instrument). Results: The search identified 4562 abstracts; 263 articles were read in full text, resulting in 99 included studies. Studies reported low levels of PPE. Integration of personal perspectives into the conversation or a future care plan was largely absent. The majority of the discussed content related to physical health, while social and psychological topics were mostly unaddressed. Conclusions: PPE occurs on a very low level in efforts to achieve SDM according to evaluation studies. Practice implications: PPE is advocated but rarely achieved in SDM evaluation studies. Causes should be identified, followed by designing interventions to improve this aspect of SDM.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2860-2870
Number of pages11
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume105
Issue number9
Early online date16 May 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2022

Keywords

  • Personal perspective elicitation
  • Preferences, values and context
  • Scoping review
  • Shared decision-making

Cite this