Abstract
Objectives: Proponents of shared decision-making (SDM) advocate the elicitation of the patient's perspective. This scoping review explores if, and to what extent, the personal perspectives of patients are elicited during a clinical encounter, as part of a SDM process. We define personal perspective elicitation (PPE) as: the disclosure (either elicited by the clinician or spontaneously expressed by the patient) of information related to the patient's personal preferences, values and/or context. Methods: A search was conducted in five literature databases from inception dates up to July 2020, to identify empirical studies about SDM (with/without SDM instrument). Results: The search identified 4562 abstracts; 263 articles were read in full text, resulting in 99 included studies. Studies reported low levels of PPE. Integration of personal perspectives into the conversation or a future care plan was largely absent. The majority of the discussed content related to physical health, while social and psychological topics were mostly unaddressed. Conclusions: PPE occurs on a very low level in efforts to achieve SDM according to evaluation studies. Practice implications: PPE is advocated but rarely achieved in SDM evaluation studies. Causes should be identified, followed by designing interventions to improve this aspect of SDM.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2860-2870 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Patient Education and Counseling |
Volume | 105 |
Issue number | 9 |
Early online date | 16 May 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2022 |
Keywords
- Personal perspective elicitation
- Preferences, values and context
- Scoping review
- Shared decision-making