Sticky steps and the gender gap: how thoughtful practices could help keep caregivers in science

Stephanie Meirmans, Dunja K. Lamatsch, Maurine Neiman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Many fewer women than men hold senior academic positions, a widely recognized and increasing problem. Our goal is to identify effective and feasible solutions. We begin by providing an in-depth assessment of the drivers of this gender inequity. In our synthesis of existing data, we provide many lines of evidence highlighting caregiving as a primary main factor. This is not a 'new' insight per se, but a point worth repeating that we back up by a strong and synthetic body of recent data. We also believe that our analysis provides a step forward in tackling a complex issue. We then develop a more detailed understanding of the challenges academic caregivers face and discuss whether and why it is important to keep caregivers in science. We find that the attrition due to caregiving should not be seen as a factor but rather as a process with multiple 'sticky steps' that eventually drive caregivers out of science-which, as we argue, is partly also good news. Indeed, it is here that we believe actions could be taken that would have a real impact: for example, one could effectively increase and expand upon current funding practices that focus on caregiver career advancement.
Original languageEnglish
Article number20221837
Pages (from-to)20221837
Number of pages1
JournalProceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society
Volume289
Issue number1987
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2022

Keywords

  • Matilda effect
  • caregiving
  • funding
  • gender
  • leaky pipeline

Cite this