TY - JOUR
T1 - A phase ii study demonstrates no feasibility of adjuvant treatment with six cycles of s-1 and oxaliplatin in resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, with ercc1 as biomarker for response to sox
AU - Stroes, Charlotte I.
AU - Schokker, Sandor
AU - Molenaar, Remco J.
AU - Mathôt, Ron A. A.
AU - Bijlsma, Maarten F.
AU - van der Woude, Stephanie O.
AU - Pereira, João P. Belo
AU - Hooijer, Gerrit K. J.
AU - Verhoeven, Rob H. A.
AU - Cats, Annemieke
AU - Grootscholten, Cecile
AU - van Sandick, Johanna W.
AU - Creemers, Geert-Jan
AU - Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard A. P.
AU - Mohammad, Nadia Haj
AU - Ruurda, Jelle P.
AU - Meijer, Sybren L.
AU - Hulshof, Maarten C. C. M.
AU - Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge
AU - van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
N1 - Funding Information: Funding: Funding for this investigator-initiated study was derived from the Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, with financial support through an unrestricted research grant from Nordic Pharma B.V. Funding Information: Conflicts of Interest: All authors completed the disclosure of conflict of interest. The following authors declared a potential conflict of interest: S. Schokker has received travel and accommodation reimbursement from Roche. R.A.A. Mathôt has received grants from NOW, ZonMW and unrestricted investigator research grants from Baxter, Baxalta, Shire, Takeda, Bayer, CSL Behring and Sobi and reports and advisory role for Bayer, CSL Behring, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Baxter, Baxalta, Shire and Takeda, with fees paid to the institution. R.H.A. Verhoeven has received research grants from Roche and BMS. N. Haj Mohammad reports an advisory role for Astra Zeneca, BMS, MSD, Servier and Elli Lilly and fees were paid to the institution. G.A.P. Nieuwenhuijzen reports an advisory role for Lilly and Medtronic, and has received unrestricted research funding from Lilly and Medtronic with fees paid to the institution. M.F. Bijlsma reports an advisory role for Servier and has received a research grant from Celgene. M.I. van Berge Henegouwen reports unrestricted research grants from Stryker and Olympus with fees paid to the institution and an advisory role for Johnson and Johnson, Mylan and Medtronic, with fees paid to the institution. H.W.M. van Laarhoven reports an advisory role for BMS, Celgene, Lilly, Merck, Nordic and Servier and has received unrestricted research funding from Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD, Nordic, Philips, Roche and Servier, with fees paid to the institution. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/2/1
Y1 - 2021/2/1
N2 - We assessed the feasibility of adjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin following neoadjuvant chemora-diotherapy (nCRT) and esophagectomy. Patients treated with nCRT (paclitaxel, carboplatin) and esophagectomy received six 21-day cycles with oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) on day 1 and S-1 (25 mg/m2 twice daily) on days 1–14. The primary endpoint was feasibility, defined as ≥50% completing treatment. We performed exploratory propensity-score matching to compare survival, ERCC1 and Thymidylate Synthase (TS) immunohistochemistry analyses, proteomics biomarker discovery and 5-FU pharmacokinetic analyses. Forty patients were enrolled and 48% completed all adjuvant cycles. Median dose intensity was 98% for S-1 and 62% for oxaliplatin. The main reason for early discontinuation was toxicity (67%). The median recurrence-free and overall survival were 28.3 months and 40.8 months, respectively (median follow-up 29.1 months). Survival was not significantly prolonged compared to a matched cohort (p = 0.09). Patients with ERCC1 negative tumor expression had significantly better survival compared to ERCC1 positivity (p = 0.01). Our protein signature model was predictive of survival [p = 0.04; Area under the curve (AUC) 0.80]. Moreover, 5-FU pharmacokinetics significantly correlated with treatment-related toxicity. To conclude, six cycles adjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin were not feasible in pretreated esophageal adenocarcinoma. Although the question remains whether additional treatment with chemotherapy should be provided in the adjuvant setting, subgroups such as patients with ERCC1 negativity could potentially benefit from adjuvant SOX based on our exploratory biomarker research.
AB - We assessed the feasibility of adjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin following neoadjuvant chemora-diotherapy (nCRT) and esophagectomy. Patients treated with nCRT (paclitaxel, carboplatin) and esophagectomy received six 21-day cycles with oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) on day 1 and S-1 (25 mg/m2 twice daily) on days 1–14. The primary endpoint was feasibility, defined as ≥50% completing treatment. We performed exploratory propensity-score matching to compare survival, ERCC1 and Thymidylate Synthase (TS) immunohistochemistry analyses, proteomics biomarker discovery and 5-FU pharmacokinetic analyses. Forty patients were enrolled and 48% completed all adjuvant cycles. Median dose intensity was 98% for S-1 and 62% for oxaliplatin. The main reason for early discontinuation was toxicity (67%). The median recurrence-free and overall survival were 28.3 months and 40.8 months, respectively (median follow-up 29.1 months). Survival was not significantly prolonged compared to a matched cohort (p = 0.09). Patients with ERCC1 negative tumor expression had significantly better survival compared to ERCC1 positivity (p = 0.01). Our protein signature model was predictive of survival [p = 0.04; Area under the curve (AUC) 0.80]. Moreover, 5-FU pharmacokinetics significantly correlated with treatment-related toxicity. To conclude, six cycles adjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin were not feasible in pretreated esophageal adenocarcinoma. Although the question remains whether additional treatment with chemotherapy should be provided in the adjuvant setting, subgroups such as patients with ERCC1 negativity could potentially benefit from adjuvant SOX based on our exploratory biomarker research.
KW - Adjuvant chemotherapy
KW - Esophageal adenocarcinoma
KW - Oxaliplatin
KW - Predictive biomarkers
KW - Proteomics
KW - S-1
KW - S-1 pharmacokinetics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100857246&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13040839
DO - https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13040839
M3 - Article
C2 - 33671266
VL - 13
SP - 1
EP - 15
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
SN - 2072-6694
IS - 4
M1 - 839
ER -