TY - JOUR
T1 - A postoperative evaluation guideline for computer-assisted reconstruction of the mandible
AU - van Baar, G.J.C.
AU - Liberton, N.P.T.J.
AU - Winters, H.A.H.
AU - Leeuwrik, L.
AU - Forouzanfar, T.
AU - Leusink, F.K.J.
PY - 2020/1/28
Y1 - 2020/1/28
N2 - Valid comparisons of postoperative accuracy results in computer-assisted reconstruction of the mandible are difficult due to heterogeneity in imaging modalities, mandibular defect classification, and evaluation methodologies between studies. This guideline uses a step-by-step approach guiding the process of imaging, classification of mandibular defects and volume assessment of three-dimensional (3D) models, after which a legitimized quantitative accuracy evaluation method can be performed between the postoperative clinical situation and the preoperative virtual plan. The condyles and the vertical and horizontal corners of the mandible are used as bony landmarks to define virtual lines in the computer-assisted surgery (CAS) software. Between these lines the axial, coronal, and both sagittal mandibular angles are calculated on both pre-and postoperative 3D models of the (neo)mandible and subsequently the deviations are calculated. By superimposing the postoperative 3D model to the preoperative virtually planned 3D model, which is fixed to the XYZ axis, the deviation between pre-and postoperative virtually planned dental implant positions can be calculated. This protocol continues and specifies an earlier publication of this evaluation guideline.
AB - Valid comparisons of postoperative accuracy results in computer-assisted reconstruction of the mandible are difficult due to heterogeneity in imaging modalities, mandibular defect classification, and evaluation methodologies between studies. This guideline uses a step-by-step approach guiding the process of imaging, classification of mandibular defects and volume assessment of three-dimensional (3D) models, after which a legitimized quantitative accuracy evaluation method can be performed between the postoperative clinical situation and the preoperative virtual plan. The condyles and the vertical and horizontal corners of the mandible are used as bony landmarks to define virtual lines in the computer-assisted surgery (CAS) software. Between these lines the axial, coronal, and both sagittal mandibular angles are calculated on both pre-and postoperative 3D models of the (neo)mandible and subsequently the deviations are calculated. By superimposing the postoperative 3D model to the preoperative virtually planned 3D model, which is fixed to the XYZ axis, the deviation between pre-and postoperative virtually planned dental implant positions can be calculated. This protocol continues and specifies an earlier publication of this evaluation guideline.
KW - Computer-aided design
KW - Computer-aided manufacturing
KW - Data accuracy
KW - Free tissue flaps
KW - Issue 155
KW - Mandibular reconstruction
KW - Medicine
KW - Oral cancer
KW - Software
KW - Surgery computer-assisted
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079521592&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.jove.com/video/60363
U2 - https://doi.org/10.3791/60363
DO - https://doi.org/10.3791/60363
M3 - Article
C2 - 32065152
SN - 1940-087X
VL - 2020
JO - Journal of Visualized Experiments
JF - Journal of Visualized Experiments
IS - 155
M1 - e60363
ER -