A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up

René P. Schellart, Katrien Oude Rengerink, Frank van der Aa, Jean-Philippe Lucot, Bart Kimpe, Dirk J. M. K. de Ridder, Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf, Jan-Paul W. R. Roovers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Midurethral sling procedures have become the prime surgical treatment for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Single-incision mini-slings (SIMS) potentially offer similar efficacy with reduced morbidity. This international multicenter trial compared the efficacy and morbidity of a SIMS (MiniArc) and a transobturator standard midurethral sling (SMUS) (Monarc). To compare subjective and objective cure, morbidity, and surgery-related discomfort following SIMS and transobturator SMUS. Prospective randomized controlled trial with an initial follow-up period of 12 mo. Women with symptomatic SUI were eligible. Primary outcome was subjective cure, defined as an improvement on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I). Coprimary outcome was the mean visual analog scale (VAS) pain score (0-100) during 3 d after surgery. Secondary outcomes were objective cure based on the cough stress test (CST), disease-specific quality of life determined by the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) score, surgical parameters, and physical performance during recovery. Analysis was by intent to treat. Differences between the MiniArc and Monarc groups on dichotomous variables were chi-square tested and presented as relative risks (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. We hypothesized that MiniArc was noninferior to Monarc concerning subjective cure and superior concerning postoperative pain. We randomized 97 women to MiniArc and 96 to Monarc. At 12-mo follow-up, subjective cure was 83% following MiniArc and 86% following Monarc (p=0.46). Objective cure was 89% following MiniArc and 91% following Monarc (p=0.65). The mean pain VAS score during the first three postoperative days was 9 following MiniArc and 22 following Monarc (Mann-Whitney U test, p <0.01). At 1-yr follow-up, MiniArc was noninferior to Monarc with respect to subjective and objective cure and superior with respect to postoperative pain. This 1-yr randomized clinical trial showed that MiniArc, a single-incision midurethral sling, is noninferior to Monarc, a transobturator sling, with respect to cure and superior with respect to pain and recovery
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1179-1185
JournalEuropean Urology
Volume66
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Cite this