TY - JOUR
T1 - Access to medicines for rare diseases
T2 - A European regulatory roadmap for academia
AU - Rosenberg, Noa
AU - van den Berg, Sibren
AU - Stolwijk, Nina N.
AU - Jacobs, Bart A. W.
AU - Post, Hendrika C.
AU - Pasmooij, Anna M. G.
AU - de Visser, Saco J.
AU - Hollak, Carla E. M.
N1 - Funding Information: This review is performed as part of a larger project “platform Medicijn voor de Maatschappij (platform Medicine for Society).” This platform is financially supported by a grant from “de Nationale Postcode Loterij” a National Lottery that distributes funds raised by this lottery for good causes primarily concerning health and welfare in Netherlands. Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2023 Rosenberg, van den Berg, Stolwijk, Jacobs, Post, Pasmooij, de Visser and Hollak.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: Novel or repurposed medicines for rare diseases often emerge from fundamental research or empirical findings in academia. However, researchers may be insufficiently aware of the possibilities and requirements to bring novel medicinal treatment options to the patient. This paper aims to provide an easily applicable, comprehensive roadmap designed for academic researchers to make medicines for rare diseases available for patients by addressing the relevant regulatory frameworks, including marketing authorization and alternative routes. Methods: Key points of the regulatory chapters “Placing on the Market” and “Scope” of Directive 2001/83/EC relating to medicinal products for human use were summarized. Provisions in EU directives regarding blood products, radiopharmaceuticals, and herbal and homeopathic medicinal products were excluded. Cross-referencing to other provisions was included. European case-law was retrieved from the InfoCuria database to exemplify the implications of alternative routes. Results: Medicines may only be placed on the market with a valid marketing authorization. To obtain such authorization in Europe, a “Common Technical Document” comprising reports on quality and non-clinical and clinical studies must be submitted to a “competent authority”, a national medicine agency or the European Medicines Agency. Timely interaction of academic researchers with regulators via scientific advice may lead to better regulatory alignment and subsequently a higher chance for approval of academic inventions. Furthermore, reimbursement by national payers could be essential to ensure patient access. Apart from the marketing authorization route, we identified multiple alternative routes to provide (early) access. These include off-label use, named-patient basis, compassionate use, pharmacy compounding, and hospital exemption for Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products. Discussion: Aligning academic (non-)clinical studies on rare diseases with regulatory and reimbursement requirements may facilitate fast and affordable access. Several alternative routes exist to provide (early) pharmaceutical care at a national level, but case-law demonstrates that alternative routes should be interpreted strictly and for exceptional situations only. Academics should be aware of these routes and their requirements to improve access to medicines for rare diseases.
AB - Background: Novel or repurposed medicines for rare diseases often emerge from fundamental research or empirical findings in academia. However, researchers may be insufficiently aware of the possibilities and requirements to bring novel medicinal treatment options to the patient. This paper aims to provide an easily applicable, comprehensive roadmap designed for academic researchers to make medicines for rare diseases available for patients by addressing the relevant regulatory frameworks, including marketing authorization and alternative routes. Methods: Key points of the regulatory chapters “Placing on the Market” and “Scope” of Directive 2001/83/EC relating to medicinal products for human use were summarized. Provisions in EU directives regarding blood products, radiopharmaceuticals, and herbal and homeopathic medicinal products were excluded. Cross-referencing to other provisions was included. European case-law was retrieved from the InfoCuria database to exemplify the implications of alternative routes. Results: Medicines may only be placed on the market with a valid marketing authorization. To obtain such authorization in Europe, a “Common Technical Document” comprising reports on quality and non-clinical and clinical studies must be submitted to a “competent authority”, a national medicine agency or the European Medicines Agency. Timely interaction of academic researchers with regulators via scientific advice may lead to better regulatory alignment and subsequently a higher chance for approval of academic inventions. Furthermore, reimbursement by national payers could be essential to ensure patient access. Apart from the marketing authorization route, we identified multiple alternative routes to provide (early) access. These include off-label use, named-patient basis, compassionate use, pharmacy compounding, and hospital exemption for Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products. Discussion: Aligning academic (non-)clinical studies on rare diseases with regulatory and reimbursement requirements may facilitate fast and affordable access. Several alternative routes exist to provide (early) pharmaceutical care at a national level, but case-law demonstrates that alternative routes should be interpreted strictly and for exceptional situations only. Academics should be aware of these routes and their requirements to improve access to medicines for rare diseases.
KW - alternative drug-to-market routes
KW - marketing authorization
KW - orphan drugs
KW - patient access
KW - rare diseases
KW - regulatory framework
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150733311&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1142351
DO - https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1142351
M3 - Article
C2 - 36925633
SN - 1663-9812
VL - 14
JO - Frontiers in pharmacology
JF - Frontiers in pharmacology
M1 - 1142351
ER -