Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction: A postoperative evaluation guideline

G.J.C. van Baar; N.P.T.J. Liberton; T. Forouzanfar; H.A.H. Winters; F.K.J. Leusink

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.013

Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction: A postoperative evaluation guideline

G.J.C. van Baar, N.P.T.J. Liberton, T. Forouzanfar, H.A.H. Winters, F.K.J. Leusink

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Comparing accuracy results for mandibular reconstructions using computer-assisted surgery (CAS) is limited due to heterogeneity in image acquisition, extent of mandibular resection, and evaluation methodologies between studies. We propose a practical, feasible and reproducible guideline for standardizing evaluation methods to allow valid comparisons of postoperative results and facilitate meta-analyses in the future. It offers a guide to imaging, data comparison, volume assessment of 3-dimensional models, classification of defects, and it also contains a quantitative accuracy evaluation method.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1-8
Number of pages	8
Journal	Oral Oncology
Volume	88
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.013
Publication status	Published - Jan 2019

Keywords

Computer-aided design
Computer-aided manufacturing
Computer-assisted
Data accuracy
Free tissue flaps
Mandibular reconstruction
Oral cancer
Printing
Software
Surgery
Three-dimensional

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.013

https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/42346978/1_s2.0_S1368837518304226_main.pdf

Cite this

@article{0ca94b6605214083a1e918e2e1210fef,

title = "Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction: A postoperative evaluation guideline",

abstract = "Comparing accuracy results for mandibular reconstructions using computer-assisted surgery (CAS) is limited due to heterogeneity in image acquisition, extent of mandibular resection, and evaluation methodologies between studies. We propose a practical, feasible and reproducible guideline for standardizing evaluation methods to allow valid comparisons of postoperative results and facilitate meta-analyses in the future. It offers a guide to imaging, data comparison, volume assessment of 3-dimensional models, classification of defects, and it also contains a quantitative accuracy evaluation method.",

keywords = "Computer-aided design, Computer-aided manufacturing, Computer-assisted, Data accuracy, Free tissue flaps, Mandibular reconstruction, Oral cancer, Printing, Software, Surgery, Three-dimensional",

author = "{van Baar}, G.J.C. and N.P.T.J. Liberton and T. Forouzanfar and H.A.H. Winters and F.K.J. Leusink",

year = "2019",

month = jan,

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.013",

language = "English",

volume = "88",

pages = "1--8",

journal = "Oral Oncology",

issn = "1368-8375",

publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction

T2 - A postoperative evaluation guideline

AU - van Baar, G.J.C.

AU - Liberton, N.P.T.J.

AU - Forouzanfar, T.

AU - Winters, H.A.H.

AU - Leusink, F.K.J.

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - Comparing accuracy results for mandibular reconstructions using computer-assisted surgery (CAS) is limited due to heterogeneity in image acquisition, extent of mandibular resection, and evaluation methodologies between studies. We propose a practical, feasible and reproducible guideline for standardizing evaluation methods to allow valid comparisons of postoperative results and facilitate meta-analyses in the future. It offers a guide to imaging, data comparison, volume assessment of 3-dimensional models, classification of defects, and it also contains a quantitative accuracy evaluation method.

AB - Comparing accuracy results for mandibular reconstructions using computer-assisted surgery (CAS) is limited due to heterogeneity in image acquisition, extent of mandibular resection, and evaluation methodologies between studies. We propose a practical, feasible and reproducible guideline for standardizing evaluation methods to allow valid comparisons of postoperative results and facilitate meta-analyses in the future. It offers a guide to imaging, data comparison, volume assessment of 3-dimensional models, classification of defects, and it also contains a quantitative accuracy evaluation method.

KW - Computer-aided design

KW - Computer-aided manufacturing

KW - Computer-assisted

KW - Data accuracy

KW - Free tissue flaps

KW - Mandibular reconstruction

KW - Oral cancer

KW - Printing

KW - Software

KW - Surgery

KW - Three-dimensional

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85056606392&origin=inward

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85056606392&doi=10.1016%2fj.oraloncology.2018.11.013&partnerID=40&md5=674f0473558fff1eec50eeac0a466dc2

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.013

DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 30616778

SN - 1368-8375

VL - 88

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Oral Oncology

JF - Oral Oncology

ER -

Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction: A postoperative evaluation guideline

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this