TY - JOUR
T1 - Added value of 3T MRI and the MRI-halo sign in assessing resectability of locally advanced pancreatic cancer following induction chemotherapy (IMAGE-MRI)
T2 - prospective pilot study
AU - Stoop, Thomas F.
AU - van Veldhuisen, Eran
AU - van Rijssen, L. Bengt
AU - Klaassen, Remy
AU - Gurney-Champion, Oliver J.
AU - de Hingh, Ignace H.
AU - Busch, Olivier R.
AU - van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
AU - van Lienden, Krijn P.
AU - Stoker, Jaap
AU - Wilmink, Johanna W.
AU - Nio, C. Yung
AU - Nederveen, Aart J.
AU - Engelbrecht, Marc R. W.
AU - Besselink, Marc G.
AU - IMAGE study group
AU - Bosscha, Koop
AU - Nieuwehof-Biesheuvel, Loes van den
AU - Marsman, Hendrik A.
AU - Seelen, Leonard W. F.
N1 - Funding Information: IMAGE study group : Koop Bosscha, Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands; Loes van den Nieuwehof-Biesheuvel, Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Hendrik A. Marsman, Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and Leonard W.F. Seelen, Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Background: Restaging of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) after induction chemotherapy using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) imaging is imprecise in evaluating local tumor response. This study explored the value of 3 Tesla (3 T) contrast-enhanced (CE) and diffusion-weighted (DWI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for local tumor restaging. Methods: This is a prospective pilot study including 20 consecutive patients with LAPC with RECIST non-progressive disease on CE-CT after induction chemotherapy. Restaging CE-CT, CE-MRI, and DWI-MRI were retrospectively evaluated by two abdominal radiologists in consensus, scoring tumor size and vascular involvement. A halo sign was defined as replacement of solid perivascular (arterial and venous) tumor tissue by a zone of fatty-like signal intensity. Results: Adequate MRI was obtained in 19 patients with LAPC after induction chemotherapy. Tumor diameter was non-significantly smaller on CE-MRI compared to CE-CT (26 mm vs. 30 mm; p = 0.073). An MRI-halo sign was seen on CE-MRI in 52.6% (n = 10/19), whereas a CT-halo sign was seen in 10.5% (n = 2/19) of patients (p = 0.016). An MRI-halo sign was not associated with resection rate (60.0% vs. 62.5%; p = 1.000). In the resection cohort, patients with an MRI-halo sign had a non-significant increased R0 resection rate as compared to patients without an MRI-halo sign (66.7% vs. 20.0%; p = 0.242). Positive and negative predictive values of the CE-MRI-halo sign for R0 resection were 66.7% and 66.7%, respectively. Conclusions: 3 T CE-MRI and the MRI-halo sign might be helpful to assess the effect of induction chemotherapy in patients with LAPC, but its diagnostic accuracy has to be evaluated in larger series.
AB - Background: Restaging of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) after induction chemotherapy using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) imaging is imprecise in evaluating local tumor response. This study explored the value of 3 Tesla (3 T) contrast-enhanced (CE) and diffusion-weighted (DWI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for local tumor restaging. Methods: This is a prospective pilot study including 20 consecutive patients with LAPC with RECIST non-progressive disease on CE-CT after induction chemotherapy. Restaging CE-CT, CE-MRI, and DWI-MRI were retrospectively evaluated by two abdominal radiologists in consensus, scoring tumor size and vascular involvement. A halo sign was defined as replacement of solid perivascular (arterial and venous) tumor tissue by a zone of fatty-like signal intensity. Results: Adequate MRI was obtained in 19 patients with LAPC after induction chemotherapy. Tumor diameter was non-significantly smaller on CE-MRI compared to CE-CT (26 mm vs. 30 mm; p = 0.073). An MRI-halo sign was seen on CE-MRI in 52.6% (n = 10/19), whereas a CT-halo sign was seen in 10.5% (n = 2/19) of patients (p = 0.016). An MRI-halo sign was not associated with resection rate (60.0% vs. 62.5%; p = 1.000). In the resection cohort, patients with an MRI-halo sign had a non-significant increased R0 resection rate as compared to patients without an MRI-halo sign (66.7% vs. 20.0%; p = 0.242). Positive and negative predictive values of the CE-MRI-halo sign for R0 resection were 66.7% and 66.7%, respectively. Conclusions: 3 T CE-MRI and the MRI-halo sign might be helpful to assess the effect of induction chemotherapy in patients with LAPC, but its diagnostic accuracy has to be evaluated in larger series.
KW - Induction chemotherapy
KW - Locally advanced pancreatic cancer
KW - Resectability
KW - Staging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139939499&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02653-y
DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02653-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 36242618
SN - 1435-2443
VL - 407
SP - 3487
EP - 3499
JO - Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
JF - Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
IS - 8
ER -