Abstract
Objective: Motivational Interviewing (MI) is increasingly used in healthcare. The Motivational Interviewing Target Scheme 2.1 (MITS) can be used to assess MI in short consultations. This quantitative validation study is a sequel to a qualitative study, which showed that the MITS is suitable for low-stakes assessment. We collected validity evidence to determine whether its suitability for high-stakes assessment in the GP-setting. Methods: Consultations of GPs and GP-trainees were assessed using the MITS. The internal structure was studied using generalizability theory; intra class correlation (ICC), convergent and divergent validity was determined. Results: Two coders and seven consultations were found to be necessary for high stakes assessment. We found higher ICCs as coders were more experienced. Convergent validity was found; results for divergent validity were mixed. Conclusion: The MITS is a suitable instrument for high-stakes MI assessments in GP-setting. The number of consultations and coders that are needed for assessment are comparable to other instruments for assessing communication skills. Practice implications: The MITS can be used to assess conversations for their MI consistency in GP-setting where most consultations are relatively short and are only partially dedicated to behaviour change. As the MITS assesses complex communication skills, experienced coders are needed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1311-1318 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Patient Education and Counseling |
Volume | 103 |
Issue number | 7 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2020 |
Keywords
- Assessment
- Complex communication skills
- General practice
- Health care
- High stakes assessment
- Motivational Interviewing
- Selective assessment
- Validation