TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessments carried out by a child abuse and neglect team in an Amsterdam teaching hospital led to interventions in most of the reported cases
AU - Teeuw, Arianne H.
AU - Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn, Tessa
AU - Aaftink, Daniel
AU - Burgers, Ilsa A. V.
AU - Vrolijk-Bosschaart, Thekla F.
AU - Brilleslijper-Kater, Sonja N.
AU - Heymans, Hugo S. A.
AU - van Rijn, Rick R.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Aim: This study described cases of child abuse and neglect (CAN) that were reported to the multiagency CAN team at the Emma Children's Hospital in Amsterdam and the resulting interventions. Methods: We carried out a retrospective review of all cases that were reported to the CAN team from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2012. Results: There were 27 prenatal cases, 92 referrals based on parental characteristics and 523 children. Overall, 1.2% of the children visiting the emergency department of our hospital, attending the outpatients department or being admitted were reported to the team. More than half of the referrals (55.1%) were confirmed as CAN. The most common diagnoses were as follows: witnessing intimate partner violence, physical neglect and emotional abuse. If CAN was confirmed an intervention was offered in 98.3% of cases. If a CAN diagnosis was undetermined or rejected, the figures were still 83.5% and 64.2%, respectively. Conclusion: Our results showed that CAN affected more than one in every 100 children visiting our hospital, and the expertise of our hospital-based CAN Team led to an intervention in the majority of the reported cases. The broad scope of problems that were encountered underlined the importance of a multidisciplinary CAN team
AB - Aim: This study described cases of child abuse and neglect (CAN) that were reported to the multiagency CAN team at the Emma Children's Hospital in Amsterdam and the resulting interventions. Methods: We carried out a retrospective review of all cases that were reported to the CAN team from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2012. Results: There were 27 prenatal cases, 92 referrals based on parental characteristics and 523 children. Overall, 1.2% of the children visiting the emergency department of our hospital, attending the outpatients department or being admitted were reported to the team. More than half of the referrals (55.1%) were confirmed as CAN. The most common diagnoses were as follows: witnessing intimate partner violence, physical neglect and emotional abuse. If CAN was confirmed an intervention was offered in 98.3% of cases. If a CAN diagnosis was undetermined or rejected, the figures were still 83.5% and 64.2%, respectively. Conclusion: Our results showed that CAN affected more than one in every 100 children visiting our hospital, and the expertise of our hospital-based CAN Team led to an intervention in the majority of the reported cases. The broad scope of problems that were encountered underlined the importance of a multidisciplinary CAN team
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13735
DO - https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13735
M3 - Article
C2 - 28036102
SN - 0803-5253
VL - 106
SP - 1118
EP - 1127
JO - Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway
JF - Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway
IS - 7
ER -