Author response to: Why was selective histopathological examination after cholecystectomy implemented suboptimally?

Vivian P. Bastiaenen, Willem A. Bemelman

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › Academic › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	e656
Journal	British Journal of Surgery
Volume	107
Issue number	13
Early online date	2020
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.12007
Publication status	Published - Dec 2020

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.12007

Other files and links

Link to publication in Scopus

Cite this

@article{cc6d769b4099434cb8ffe90c754066ae,

title = "Author response to: Why was selective histopathological examination after cholecystectomy implemented suboptimally?",

author = "Bastiaenen, {Vivian P.} and Bemelman, {Willem A.}",

year = "2020",

month = dec,

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.12007",

language = "English",

volume = "107",

pages = "e656",

journal = "British Journal of Surgery",

issn = "0007-1323",

publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Author response to: Why was selective histopathological examination after cholecystectomy implemented suboptimally?

AU - Bastiaenen, Vivian P.

AU - Bemelman, Willem A.

PY - 2020/12

Y1 - 2020/12

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091687262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.12007

DO - https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.12007

M3 - Letter

C2 - 32990392

SN - 0007-1323

VL - 107

SP - e656

JO - British Journal of Surgery

JF - British Journal of Surgery

IS - 13

ER -