TY - GEN
T1 - Availability and Accuracy of electronic patient data for medical practice assessment
AU - Prins, H.
AU - Kruisinga, F.
AU - Büller, H.
AU - Zwetsloot-Schonk, Jhm
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - We analyzed availability and accuracy of electronic patient data needed to assess medical practice. A case study was performed in which pediatricians formulated 14 performance indicators that cover aspects of care for children with suspected meningitis. Data items needed to quantify these indicators were listed. Required patient data were gathered from hospital information system and paper medical records. Accuracy of electronically available data was based on comparison with paper data and, when paper data were not available, on how data were recorded at the source, administrative procedures and original goal for which data were recorded. Conclusion: Registration of reason for admission and diagnoses gives no reliable basis to select patients with 'suspicion on a disease' as selection criterion. Besides, many performance indicators cannot be reliably quantified because data are not recorded electronically (indication, medication, outpatient diagnosis), are not recorded specific enough (intervention time), are not standardized (radiology report), or cannot be obtained from other hospitals.
AB - We analyzed availability and accuracy of electronic patient data needed to assess medical practice. A case study was performed in which pediatricians formulated 14 performance indicators that cover aspects of care for children with suspected meningitis. Data items needed to quantify these indicators were listed. Required patient data were gathered from hospital information system and paper medical records. Accuracy of electronically available data was based on comparison with paper data and, when paper data were not available, on how data were recorded at the source, administrative procedures and original goal for which data were recorded. Conclusion: Registration of reason for admission and diagnoses gives no reliable basis to select patients with 'suspicion on a disease' as selection criterion. Besides, many performance indicators cannot be reliably quantified because data are not recorded electronically (indication, medication, outpatient diagnosis), are not recorded specific enough (intervention time), are not standardized (radiology report), or cannot be obtained from other hospitals.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034568482&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-921-9-484
DO - https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-921-9-484
M3 - Conference contribution
C2 - 2001134218
SN - 1586030639
SN - 9781586030636
T3 - Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
SP - 484
EP - 488
BT - Medical Infobahn for Europe - Proceedings of MIE 2000 and GMDS 2000
PB - IOS Press
T2 - 16th Medical Informatics Europe Congress, MIE 2000 and 45th Annual Congress on German Association for Medical Informatics, Biometry, andEpidemiology, GMDS 2000
Y2 - 27 August 2000 through 1 September 2000
ER -