TY - JOUR
T1 - Azacitidine maintenance after intensive chemotherapy improves DFS in older AML patients
AU - Huls, Gerwin
AU - Chitu, Dana A.
AU - Havelange, Violaine
AU - Jongen-Lavrencic, Mojca
AU - van de Loosdrecht, Arjan A.
AU - Biemond, Bart J.
AU - Sinnige, Harm
AU - Hodossy, Beata
AU - Graux, Carlos
AU - Kooy, Rien van Marwijk
AU - de Weerdt, Okke
AU - Breems, Dimitri
AU - Klein, Saskia
AU - Kuball, J. rgen
AU - Deeren, Dries
AU - Terpstra, Wim
AU - Vekemans, Marie-Christiane
AU - Ossenkoppele, Gert J.
AU - Vellenga, Edo
AU - Löwenberg, Bob
AU - Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group (HOVON)
AU - Kuball, J.
AU - van Marwijk-Kooy, M.
N1 - Funding Information: This investigator-sponsored trial was financially supported by Celgene, and they provided the azacitidine used in the trial free of charge. This study has been supported by a grant for the Dutch Cancer Foundation (KUN 2008-4291). Publisher Copyright: © 2019 by The American Society of Hematology. Copyright: Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - he prevention of relapse is the major therapeutic challenge in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who have obtained a complete remission (CR) on intensive chemotherapy. In this randomized phase 3 study (HOVON97) in older patients (≥60 years) with AML or myelodysplastic syndrome with refractory anemia with excess of blasts, in CR/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) after at least 2 cycles of intensive chemotherapy, we assessed the value of azacitidine as postremission therapy with respect to disease-free survival (DFS; primary end point) and overall survival (OS; secondary end point). In total, 116 eligible patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to either observation (N = 60) or azacitidine maintenance (N = 56; 50 mg/m 2, subcutaneously, days 1-5, every 4 weeks) until relapse, for a maximum of 12 cycles. Fifty-five patients received at least 1 cycle of azacitidine, 46 at least 4 cycles, and 35 at least 12 cycles. The maintenance treatment with azacitidine was feasible. DFS was significantly better for the azacitidine treatment group (logrank; P = .04), as well as after adjustment for poor-risk cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis and platelet count at randomization (as surrogate for CR vs CRi; Cox regression; hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.95; P = .026). The 12-month DFS was estimated at 64% for the azacitidine group and 42% for the control group. OS did not differ between treatment groups, with and without censoring for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Rescue treatment was used more often in the observation group (n = 32) than in the azacitidine maintenance group (n = 9). We conclude that azacitidine maintenance after CR/CRi after intensive chemotherapy is feasible and significantly improves DFS.
AB - he prevention of relapse is the major therapeutic challenge in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who have obtained a complete remission (CR) on intensive chemotherapy. In this randomized phase 3 study (HOVON97) in older patients (≥60 years) with AML or myelodysplastic syndrome with refractory anemia with excess of blasts, in CR/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) after at least 2 cycles of intensive chemotherapy, we assessed the value of azacitidine as postremission therapy with respect to disease-free survival (DFS; primary end point) and overall survival (OS; secondary end point). In total, 116 eligible patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to either observation (N = 60) or azacitidine maintenance (N = 56; 50 mg/m 2, subcutaneously, days 1-5, every 4 weeks) until relapse, for a maximum of 12 cycles. Fifty-five patients received at least 1 cycle of azacitidine, 46 at least 4 cycles, and 35 at least 12 cycles. The maintenance treatment with azacitidine was feasible. DFS was significantly better for the azacitidine treatment group (logrank; P = .04), as well as after adjustment for poor-risk cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis and platelet count at randomization (as surrogate for CR vs CRi; Cox regression; hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.95; P = .026). The 12-month DFS was estimated at 64% for the azacitidine group and 42% for the control group. OS did not differ between treatment groups, with and without censoring for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Rescue treatment was used more often in the observation group (n = 32) than in the azacitidine maintenance group (n = 9). We conclude that azacitidine maintenance after CR/CRi after intensive chemotherapy is feasible and significantly improves DFS.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064118597&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85064118597&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30630862
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-10-879866
DO - https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-10-879866
M3 - Article
C2 - 30630862
SN - 0006-4971
VL - 133
SP - 1457
EP - 1464
JO - Blood
JF - Blood
IS - 13
ER -