TY - JOUR
T1 - Biomarker matrix to track short term disease progression in amnestic mild cognitive impairment patients with prodromal Alzheimer's disease
AU - Marizzoni, Moira
AU - Ferrari, Clarissa
AU - Macis, Ambra
AU - Jovicich, Jorge
AU - Albani, Diego
AU - Babiloni, Claudio
AU - Cavaliere, Libera
AU - Didic, Mira
AU - Forloni, Gianluigi
AU - Galluzzi, Samantha
AU - Hoffmann, Karl-Titus
AU - Molinuevo, José Luis
AU - Nobili, Flavio
AU - Parnetti, Lucilla
AU - Payoux, Pierre
AU - Pizzini, Francesca
AU - Rossini, Paolo Maria
AU - Salvatore, Marco
AU - Schönknecht, Peter
AU - Soricelli, Andrea
AU - del Percio, Claudio
AU - Hensch, Tilman
AU - Hegerl, Ulrich
AU - Tsolaki, Magda
AU - Visser, Pieter Jelle
AU - Wiltfang, Jens
AU - Richardson, Jill C.
AU - Bordet, R. gis
AU - Blin, Olivier
AU - Frisoni, Giovanni B.
N1 - Funding Information: aLaboratory of Neuroimaging and Alzheimer’s Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy bUnit of Statistics, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy cCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Italy dDepartment of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy eDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology “V. Erspamer”, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy fHospital San Raffaele Cassino, Cassino (FR), Italy gAix-Marseille Université, Inserm, INS UMR S 1106, Marseille, France hAPHM, Timone, Service de Neurologie et Neuropsychologie, APHM Hôpital Timone Adultes, Marseille, France jiDepartment′ of Neuroradiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany Alzheimer s Disease Unit and Other Cognitive Disorders Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, and Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain kDepartment of Neuroscience (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy lClinica Neurologica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy mClinica Neurologica, Università di Perugia, Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia, Perugia, Italy nINSERM; Imagerie cérébrale et handicaps neurologiques UMR 825, Toulouse, France oDepartment of Diagnostics and Pathology, Neuroradiology, Verona University Hospital, Italy pDepartment of Gerontology, Area of Neuroscience, Neurosciences & Orthopedics, Catholic University, Policlinic A. Gemelli Foundation Rome, Italy qSDN Istituto di Ricerca Diagnostica e Nucleare, Napoli, Italy rDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany s3rd Neurologic Clinic, Medical School, G. Papanikolaou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece tDepartment of Neurology, Alzheimer Centre, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Publisher Copyright: © 2019 - IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - Background: Assessment of human brain atrophy in temporal regions using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), resting state functional MRI connectivity in the left parietal cortex, and limbic electroencephalographic (rsEEG) rhythms as well as plasma amyloid peptide 42 (Aβ 42 ) has shown that each is a promising biomarker of disease progression in amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) patients with prodromal Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the value of their combined use is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the association with cognitive decline and the effect on sample size calculation when using a biomarker composite matrix in prodromal AD clinical trials. Methods: Multicenter longitudinal study with follow-up of 2 years or until development of incident dementia. APOE ϵ4-specific cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ 42 /P-tau cut-offs were used to identify aMCI with prodromal AD. Linear mixed models were performed 1) with repeated matrix values and time as factors to explain the longitudinal changes in ADAS-cog13, 2) with CSF Aβ 42 /P-tau status, time, and CSF Aβ 42 /P-tau status×time interaction as factors to explain the longitudinal changes in matrix measures, and 3) to compute sample size estimation for a trial implemented with the selected matrices. Results: The best composite matrix included the MRI volumes of hippocampal dentate gyrus and lateral ventricle. This matrix showed the best sensitivity to track disease progression and required a sample size 31% lower than that of the best individual biomarker (i.e., volume of hippocampal dentate gyrus). Conclusion: Optimal matrices improved the statistical power to track disease development and to measure clinical progression in the short-term period. This might contribute to optimize the design of future clinical trials in MCI.
AB - Background: Assessment of human brain atrophy in temporal regions using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), resting state functional MRI connectivity in the left parietal cortex, and limbic electroencephalographic (rsEEG) rhythms as well as plasma amyloid peptide 42 (Aβ 42 ) has shown that each is a promising biomarker of disease progression in amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) patients with prodromal Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the value of their combined use is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the association with cognitive decline and the effect on sample size calculation when using a biomarker composite matrix in prodromal AD clinical trials. Methods: Multicenter longitudinal study with follow-up of 2 years or until development of incident dementia. APOE ϵ4-specific cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ 42 /P-tau cut-offs were used to identify aMCI with prodromal AD. Linear mixed models were performed 1) with repeated matrix values and time as factors to explain the longitudinal changes in ADAS-cog13, 2) with CSF Aβ 42 /P-tau status, time, and CSF Aβ 42 /P-tau status×time interaction as factors to explain the longitudinal changes in matrix measures, and 3) to compute sample size estimation for a trial implemented with the selected matrices. Results: The best composite matrix included the MRI volumes of hippocampal dentate gyrus and lateral ventricle. This matrix showed the best sensitivity to track disease progression and required a sample size 31% lower than that of the best individual biomarker (i.e., volume of hippocampal dentate gyrus). Conclusion: Optimal matrices improved the statistical power to track disease development and to measure clinical progression in the short-term period. This might contribute to optimize the design of future clinical trials in MCI.
KW - Alzheimer's disease
KW - biomarker matrices
KW - clinical trial
KW - magnetic resonance imaging
KW - mild cognitive impairment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065677389&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-181016
DO - https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-181016
M3 - Article
C2 - 30958351
SN - 1387-2877
VL - 69
SP - 49
EP - 58
JO - Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
JF - Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
IS - 1
ER -