TY - JOUR
T1 - Can nuclear imaging accurately detect scar in ischemic cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates?
AU - Degtiarova, Ganna
AU - Claus, Piet
AU - Duchenne, J. rgen
AU - Schramm, Georg
AU - Nuyts, Johan
AU - Bogaert, Jan
AU - Vöros, Gabor
AU - Willems, Rik
AU - Verberne, Hein J.
AU - Voigt, Jens-Uwe
AU - Gheysens, Olivier
N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by a KU Leuven research grant [OT/12/084]. The study was approved by the local institutional ethics committee and all patients gave written and informed consent prior to inclusion. The WORK-CRT study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02537782). Consent for publication has been obtained from the patients. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/5/1
Y1 - 2022/5/1
N2 - Background Accurate scar assessment is crucial in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) candidates, since its presence is a negative predictor for CRT response. Therefore, we assessed the performance of different PET parameters to detect scar in CRT candidates. Methods: Twenty-nine CRT candidates underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG)-PET/computed tomography (CT), resting 13N-NH3-PET/CT and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) prior to CRT implantation. Segmental 18F-FDG uptake, late 13N-NH3 uptake and absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) were evaluated for scar detection using late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) CMR as reference. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) ≥0.8 indicated a good accuracy of the methods evaluated. Results Scar was present in 111 of 464 segments. None of the approaches could reliably identify segments with nontransmural scar, except for 18F-FDG uptake in the lateral wall (AUC 0.83). Segmental transmural scars could be detected with all methods (AUC ≥ 0.8), except for septal 18F-FDG uptake and MBF in the inferior wall (AUC < 0.8). Late 13N-NH3 uptake was the best parameter for transmural scar detection, independent of its location, with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 92% using a cutoff of 66% of the maximum tracer activity. Conclusions Late 13N-NH3 uptake is superior to 13N-NH3 MBF and 18F-FDG in detecting transmural scar, independently of its location. However, none of the tested PET parameters was able to accurately detect nontransmural scar.
AB - Background Accurate scar assessment is crucial in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) candidates, since its presence is a negative predictor for CRT response. Therefore, we assessed the performance of different PET parameters to detect scar in CRT candidates. Methods: Twenty-nine CRT candidates underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG)-PET/computed tomography (CT), resting 13N-NH3-PET/CT and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) prior to CRT implantation. Segmental 18F-FDG uptake, late 13N-NH3 uptake and absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) were evaluated for scar detection using late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) CMR as reference. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) ≥0.8 indicated a good accuracy of the methods evaluated. Results Scar was present in 111 of 464 segments. None of the approaches could reliably identify segments with nontransmural scar, except for 18F-FDG uptake in the lateral wall (AUC 0.83). Segmental transmural scars could be detected with all methods (AUC ≥ 0.8), except for septal 18F-FDG uptake and MBF in the inferior wall (AUC < 0.8). Late 13N-NH3 uptake was the best parameter for transmural scar detection, independent of its location, with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 92% using a cutoff of 66% of the maximum tracer activity. Conclusions Late 13N-NH3 uptake is superior to 13N-NH3 MBF and 18F-FDG in detecting transmural scar, independently of its location. However, none of the tested PET parameters was able to accurately detect nontransmural scar.
KW - PET
KW - cardiac magnetic resonance
KW - cardiac resynchronization therapy
KW - myocardial viability
KW - scar
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128487318&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001533
DO - https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001533
M3 - Article
C2 - 35045554
SN - 0143-3636
VL - 43
SP - 502
EP - 509
JO - Nuclear Medicine Communications
JF - Nuclear Medicine Communications
IS - 5
ER -