Can operator-controlled imaging reduce fluoroscopy time during flexible ureterorenoscopy?

Michaël M. E. L. Henderickx, Tim Brits, Natalia S. Zabegalina, Joyce Baard, Mansour Ballout, Harrie P. Beerlage, Stefan De Wachter, Guido M. Kamphuis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction Fluoroscopy is routinely used during ureterorenoscopy. According to the ‘As Low As Reasonably Achievable’ (ALARA) principle, radiation exposure should be kept as low as reasonably achievable to decrease the risk of negative long-term effects of radiation for patients and medical staff. This study aims to assess if operator-controlled imaging during flexible ureterorenoscopy for nephrolithiasis could reduce fluoroscopy time when compared to radiographer-controlled imaging. Material and methods This study was a bicentric, retrospective comparison between patients treated for nephrolithiasis with flexible ureterorenoscopy with either operator-controlled imaging or radiogra-pher-controlled imaging. A total of 100 patients were included, 50 were treated with operator-controlled imaging and 50 with radiographer-controlled imaging. Patients undergoing flexible ureterorenoscopy with a total stone burden <20 mm and data on radiation exposure were included. Patient characteris-tics, stone characteristics, surgical details and fluoroscopy time were recorded for each patient and both groups were compared. Patient data were expressed as median. A 2-sided p-value <0.005 was considered statistically significant. Results This study found no significant differences between both groups regarding the patient and stone characteristics. However, it found a significant shorter fluoroscopy time in the operator-controlled imaging group of 33.5 seconds (IQR 16.0–70.0) compared to 57.0 seconds (IQR 36.8–95.3) in the radiographer-controlled imaging group (p = 0.001). Conclusions This study shows that operator-controlled imaging in flexible ureterorenoscopy could reduce fluoroscopy time when compared to radiographer-controlled imaging. Operator-controlled imaging might therefore allow urologists to perform ureterorenoscopy with greater independence while ad-ditionally reducing fluoroscopy time and its consequent negative effects for medical staff and patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)90-95
Number of pages6
JournalCentral European journal of urology
Volume75
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • ALARA-principle
  • endourology
  • fluoroscopy
  • radiation exposure
  • ureterorenosco

Cite this