Can quantitative EEG measures predict clinical outcome in subjects at Clinical High Risk for psychosis? A prospective multicenter study

Mirjam J. van Tricht, Stephan Ruhrmann, Martijn Arns, Ralf Müller, Mitja Bodatsch, Eva Velthorst, Johannes H. T. M. Koelman, Lo J. Bour, Katharina Zurek, Frauke Schultze-Lutter, Joachim Klosterkötter, Don H. Linszen, Lieuwe de Haan, Anke Brockhaus-Dumke, Dorien H. Nieman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prediction studies in subjects at Clinical High Risk (CHR) for psychosis are hampered by a high proportion of uncertain outcomes. We therefore investigated whether quantitative EEG (QEEG) parameters can contribute to an improved identification of CHR subjects with a later conversion to psychosis. This investigation was a project within the European Prediction of Psychosis Study (EPOS), a prospective multicenter, naturalistic field study with an 18-month follow-up period. QEEG spectral power and alpha peak frequencies (APF) were determined in 113 CHR subjects. The primary outcome measure was conversion to psychosis. Cox regression yielded a model including frontal theta (HR=1.82; [95% CI 1.00-3.32]) and delta (HR=2.60; [95% CI 1.30-5.20]) power, and occipital-parietal APF (HR=.52; [95% CI .35-.80]) as predictors of conversion to psychosis. The resulting equation enabled the development of a prognostic index with three risk classes (hazard rate 0.057 to 0.81). Power in theta and delta ranges and APF contribute to the short-term prediction of psychosis and enable a further stratification of risk in CHR samples. Combined with (other) clinical ratings, EEG parameters may therefore be a useful tool for individualized risk estimation and, consequently, targeted prevention
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)42-47
JournalSchizophrenia Research
Volume153
Issue number1-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Cite this