TY - JOUR
T1 - Can the Borg CR-10 scale for neck and low back discomfort predict future neck and low back pain among high-risk office workers?
AU - Waongenngarm, Pooriput
AU - van der Beek, Allard J.
AU - Janwantanakul, Prawit
AU - Akkarakittichoke, Nipaporn
AU - Coenen, Pieter
N1 - Funding Information: This work has been funded by the Thailand Research Fund through the Royal Golden Jubilee PhD Program (PHD/0180/2558) and Industry Division (RDG6050058). Srithai Auto Seats Industry Company Limited also provided financial support for this study but did not play a role in the development of the methodology, data collection, and/or data analysis of the study. Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Purpose: Perceived discomfort could indicate an early sign of pain, for example, as a result of a biomechanical load on the musculoskeletal system. Assessing discomfort can, therefore, help to identify workers at increased risk of musculoskeletal disorders for targeted intervention development. We aimed: (1) to identify the optimal cut-off value of neck and low back discomfort among office workers and (2) to evaluate its predictive validity with future neck and low back pain, respectively. Methods: At baseline healthy participants (n = 100) completed questionnaires, including the Borg CR-10 discomfort scale (on a 0–10 scale), and were followed for six months, during which musculoskeletal pain was assessed monthly. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the associations of baseline discomfort with the onset of future neck or low back pain. Sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve were estimated to identify the optimal discomfort cut-off value predicting future pain. Results: Borg CR-10 scores ≥ 3.5 for perceived neck and low back discomfort had acceptable sensitivity and specificity to predict future neck and low back pain, respectively. Perceived discomfort at baseline as a dichotomous measure (using the ≥ 3.5 cut-off) was a statistically significant predictor of future neck pain (OR = 10.33) and low back pain (OR = 11.81). Conclusion: We identified the optimal cut-off value of the Borg CR-10 discomfort scale to identify office workers at increased risk of developing neck and low back pain. These findings might benefit ergonomists, primary health care providers, and occupational health researchers in developing targeted interventions.
AB - Purpose: Perceived discomfort could indicate an early sign of pain, for example, as a result of a biomechanical load on the musculoskeletal system. Assessing discomfort can, therefore, help to identify workers at increased risk of musculoskeletal disorders for targeted intervention development. We aimed: (1) to identify the optimal cut-off value of neck and low back discomfort among office workers and (2) to evaluate its predictive validity with future neck and low back pain, respectively. Methods: At baseline healthy participants (n = 100) completed questionnaires, including the Borg CR-10 discomfort scale (on a 0–10 scale), and were followed for six months, during which musculoskeletal pain was assessed monthly. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the associations of baseline discomfort with the onset of future neck or low back pain. Sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve were estimated to identify the optimal discomfort cut-off value predicting future pain. Results: Borg CR-10 scores ≥ 3.5 for perceived neck and low back discomfort had acceptable sensitivity and specificity to predict future neck and low back pain, respectively. Perceived discomfort at baseline as a dichotomous measure (using the ≥ 3.5 cut-off) was a statistically significant predictor of future neck pain (OR = 10.33) and low back pain (OR = 11.81). Conclusion: We identified the optimal cut-off value of the Borg CR-10 discomfort scale to identify office workers at increased risk of developing neck and low back pain. These findings might benefit ergonomists, primary health care providers, and occupational health researchers in developing targeted interventions.
KW - Discomfort
KW - Low back pain
KW - Neck pain
KW - Office workers
KW - Predictive validity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131300931&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01883-3
DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01883-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 35650349
SN - 0340-0131
VL - 95
SP - 1881
EP - 1889
JO - International archives of occupational and environmental health
JF - International archives of occupational and environmental health
IS - 9
ER -