TY - JOUR
T1 - Cartilage tissue turnover increases with high- compared to low-intensity resistance training in patients with knee OA
AU - Thudium, Christian S.
AU - Engstrøm, Amalie
AU - Bay-Jensen, Anne-Christine
AU - Frederiksen, Peder
AU - Jansen, Nuria
AU - de Zwart, Arjan
AU - van der Leeden, Marike
AU - Dekker, Joost
AU - Lems, Willem
AU - Roorda, Leo
AU - van Spil, Willem Evert
AU - van der Esch, Martin
N1 - Funding Information: AE is funded by the Danish Research Foundation. The study was funded by the Dutch Arthritis Association. Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - OBJECTIVES: To investigate cartilage tissue turnover in response to a supervised 12-week exercise-related joint loading training program followed by a 6-month period of unsupervised training in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). To study the difference in cartilage tissue turnover between high- and low-resistance training. METHOD: Patients with knee OA were randomized into either high-intensity or low-intensity resistance supervised training (two sessions per week) for 3 months and unsupervised training for 6 months. Blood samples were collected before and after the supervised training period and after the follow-up period. Biomarkers huARGS, C2M, and PRO-C2, quantifying cartilage tissue turnover, were measured by ELISA. Changes in biomarker levels over time within and between groups were analyzed using linear mixed models with baseline values as covariates. RESULTS: huARGS and C2M levels increased after training and at follow-up in both low- and high-intensity exercise groups. No changes were found in PRO-C2. The huARGS level in the high-intensity resistance training group increased significantly compared to the low-intensity resistance training group after resistance training (p = 0.029) and at follow-up (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Cartilage tissue turnover and cartilage degradation appear to increase in response to a 3-month exercise-related joint loading training program and at 6-month follow-up, with no evident difference in type II collagen formation. Aggrecan remodeling increased more with high-intensity resistance training than with low-intensity exercise. These exploratory biomarker results, indicating more cartilage degeneration in the high-intensity group, in combination with no clinical outcome differences of the VIDEX study, may argue against high-intensity training.
AB - OBJECTIVES: To investigate cartilage tissue turnover in response to a supervised 12-week exercise-related joint loading training program followed by a 6-month period of unsupervised training in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). To study the difference in cartilage tissue turnover between high- and low-resistance training. METHOD: Patients with knee OA were randomized into either high-intensity or low-intensity resistance supervised training (two sessions per week) for 3 months and unsupervised training for 6 months. Blood samples were collected before and after the supervised training period and after the follow-up period. Biomarkers huARGS, C2M, and PRO-C2, quantifying cartilage tissue turnover, were measured by ELISA. Changes in biomarker levels over time within and between groups were analyzed using linear mixed models with baseline values as covariates. RESULTS: huARGS and C2M levels increased after training and at follow-up in both low- and high-intensity exercise groups. No changes were found in PRO-C2. The huARGS level in the high-intensity resistance training group increased significantly compared to the low-intensity resistance training group after resistance training (p = 0.029) and at follow-up (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Cartilage tissue turnover and cartilage degradation appear to increase in response to a 3-month exercise-related joint loading training program and at 6-month follow-up, with no evident difference in type II collagen formation. Aggrecan remodeling increased more with high-intensity resistance training than with low-intensity exercise. These exploratory biomarker results, indicating more cartilage degeneration in the high-intensity group, in combination with no clinical outcome differences of the VIDEX study, may argue against high-intensity training.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147895645&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-023-03000-2
DO - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-023-03000-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 36765372
SN - 1478-6354
VL - 25
SP - 22
JO - Arthritis research & therapy
JF - Arthritis research & therapy
IS - 1
M1 - 22
ER -