TY - JOUR
T1 - Changes in the role of explanatory factors for socioeconomic inequalities in physical performance
T2 - a comparative study of three birth cohorts
AU - Klokgieters, S.S.
AU - Kok, A.A.L.
AU - Visser, M.
AU - van Groenou, M.I.B.
AU - Huisman, M.
N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) [project number 50–53100–98-308] ( https://www.zonmw.nl/nl/ ). The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam is supported by a grant from the Netherlands Ministry of Health Welfare and Sports, Direcstorate of Long-Term Care ( https://www.government.nl/ministries/ministry-ofhealth-welfare-and-sport ). The data collection in 2012–2013 and 2013–2014 was financially supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) in the framework of the project “New Cohorts of young old in the 21st century” [file number 480–10-014] ( https://www.nwo.nl/ ). Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/12/11
Y1 - 2021/12/11
N2 - © 2021, The Author(s).Background: Due to societal changes and changes in the availability of health promoting factors, explanatory factors of socioeconomic inequalities in health (SIH) may change with time. We investigate differences in the relative importance of behavioural, social and psychological factors for explaining inequalities in physical performance between three birth cohorts. Methods: Data came from N = 988, N = 1002, and N = 1023 adults aged 55–64 years, collected in 1992, 2002 and 2012 as part of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Physical performance was measured by three performance tests. We included lifestyle factors (physical activity, smoking, alcohol use and Body Mass Index (BMI)); social factors (network size, network complexity, divorce, social support); and psychological factors (mastery, self-efficacy and neuroticism). In multi-group mediation models, we tested whether the strength of indirect effects from socioeconomic position (SEP) via the explanatory factors to health differed between birth cohorts. Stronger indirect effects indicate an increase in the importance; weaker indirect effects indicate a decrease in importance. Results: Absolute SIH were present and similar across cohorts. The strength of indirect effects of SEP on physical performance through smoking, binge alcohol use, emotional support and mastery increased across cohorts. The indirect effects of BMI, network size, self-efficacy and neuroticism were similar across cohorts. Conclusions: Inequalities in smoking, binge alcohol use, emotional support and mastery may have become more important for explaining SIH in recent cohorts of middle-aged adults. Policies that aim to reduce socioeconomic inequalities may need to adapt their targets of intervention to changing mechanisms in order to reduce SIH.
AB - © 2021, The Author(s).Background: Due to societal changes and changes in the availability of health promoting factors, explanatory factors of socioeconomic inequalities in health (SIH) may change with time. We investigate differences in the relative importance of behavioural, social and psychological factors for explaining inequalities in physical performance between three birth cohorts. Methods: Data came from N = 988, N = 1002, and N = 1023 adults aged 55–64 years, collected in 1992, 2002 and 2012 as part of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Physical performance was measured by three performance tests. We included lifestyle factors (physical activity, smoking, alcohol use and Body Mass Index (BMI)); social factors (network size, network complexity, divorce, social support); and psychological factors (mastery, self-efficacy and neuroticism). In multi-group mediation models, we tested whether the strength of indirect effects from socioeconomic position (SEP) via the explanatory factors to health differed between birth cohorts. Stronger indirect effects indicate an increase in the importance; weaker indirect effects indicate a decrease in importance. Results: Absolute SIH were present and similar across cohorts. The strength of indirect effects of SEP on physical performance through smoking, binge alcohol use, emotional support and mastery increased across cohorts. The indirect effects of BMI, network size, self-efficacy and neuroticism were similar across cohorts. Conclusions: Inequalities in smoking, binge alcohol use, emotional support and mastery may have become more important for explaining SIH in recent cohorts of middle-aged adults. Policies that aim to reduce socioeconomic inequalities may need to adapt their targets of intervention to changing mechanisms in order to reduce SIH.
KW - Cohort differences
KW - Mediation analysis
KW - Physical performance
KW - Socioeconomic inequalities
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120938473&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01592-2
DO - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01592-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 34895239
SN - 1475-9276
VL - 20
SP - 252
JO - International journal for equity in health
JF - International journal for equity in health
IS - 1
M1 - 252
ER -