TY - JOUR
T1 - Colorectal Cancer Stage Distribution at First and Repeat Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening
AU - Kooyker, Arthur
AU - de Jonge, Lucie
AU - Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther
AU - Spaander, Manon
AU - van Vuuren, Hanneke
AU - Kuipers, Ernst
AU - van Kemenade, Folkert
AU - Ramakers, Chris
AU - Dekker, Evelien
AU - Nagtegaal, Iris
AU - van Leerdam, Monique
AU - Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
N1 - Funding Information: Funding This study was funded by the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. The funding source had no involvement in the study design, collection of data, analysis, and interpretation of the data. Funding Information: Conflicts of interest These authors disclose the following: Evelien Dekker has received endoscopic equipment on loan from Olympus and FujiFilm, has received a research grant from FujiFilm, has received honorarium for consultancy from FujiFilm, Tillots, Olympus, GI Supply, Cancer Prevention Pharmaceuticals, PAION, and Ambu, and speakers' fees from Olympus, Roche, GI Supply, PAION, and IPSEN; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar is an associate editor at Gastroenterology, serves as an expert at the Health Council, serves as a panel member of the European Commission Initiative on Colorectal Cancer, and is a visiting scientist at the International Agency for Research on Cancer; and Manon Spaander has received research support from Sentinel, Sysmex, Boston Scientific, Norgine, and Medtronic. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Background & Aims: For colorectal cancer (CRC) screening to be effective, it is important that screen-detected cancers are found at an early stage. Studies on stage distribution of screen-detected CRC at repeat screening of large population-based fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening programs and the impact of FIT cut-off values on staging currently are lacking. Methods: We obtained data for FIT-positive participants (FIT cut-off, 47 μg hemoglobin/g feces) at their first or second (ie, repeat) screening from the Dutch National Screening Database from 2014 to 2018. Tumor characteristics were acquired through linkage with The Netherlands Cancer Registry. We compared stage at diagnosis (I–II vs III–IV) of CRCs detected at a first or second screening. In addition, we analyzed the hypothetical yield and stage distribution of CRC for different FIT cut-off values up to 250 μg hemoglobin/g feces. Results: At the first and second screenings, respectively, 15,755 and 3304 CRCs were detected. CRCs detected at the first or second screening were equally likely to be stages I to II (66.5% vs 67.7%; relative risk, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00–1.05). A hypothetical increase of the FIT cut-off value from 47 μg to 250 μg resulted in a reduction of detected CRCs by 88.3% and 79.0% at the first or second screening, respectively. Even then, the majority of detected CRCs (63%–64%) still would be diagnosed at stages I to II. Conclusions: FIT-based screening is effective in downstaging CRC, and also at repeat screening. Increasingly, the FIT cut-off level has a limited impact on the stage distribution of detected CRCs, although it greatly affects CRC detection and thus is important to keep low.
AB - Background & Aims: For colorectal cancer (CRC) screening to be effective, it is important that screen-detected cancers are found at an early stage. Studies on stage distribution of screen-detected CRC at repeat screening of large population-based fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening programs and the impact of FIT cut-off values on staging currently are lacking. Methods: We obtained data for FIT-positive participants (FIT cut-off, 47 μg hemoglobin/g feces) at their first or second (ie, repeat) screening from the Dutch National Screening Database from 2014 to 2018. Tumor characteristics were acquired through linkage with The Netherlands Cancer Registry. We compared stage at diagnosis (I–II vs III–IV) of CRCs detected at a first or second screening. In addition, we analyzed the hypothetical yield and stage distribution of CRC for different FIT cut-off values up to 250 μg hemoglobin/g feces. Results: At the first and second screenings, respectively, 15,755 and 3304 CRCs were detected. CRCs detected at the first or second screening were equally likely to be stages I to II (66.5% vs 67.7%; relative risk, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00–1.05). A hypothetical increase of the FIT cut-off value from 47 μg to 250 μg resulted in a reduction of detected CRCs by 88.3% and 79.0% at the first or second screening, respectively. Even then, the majority of detected CRCs (63%–64%) still would be diagnosed at stages I to II. Conclusions: FIT-based screening is effective in downstaging CRC, and also at repeat screening. Increasingly, the FIT cut-off level has a limited impact on the stage distribution of detected CRCs, although it greatly affects CRC detection and thus is important to keep low.
KW - Cancer
KW - Colorectal
KW - Cut-Off
KW - FIT
KW - Screening
KW - Stage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85172766188&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2023.07.028
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2023.07.028
M3 - Article
C2 - 37619823
SN - 1542-3565
VL - 21
SP - 3424-3432.e2
JO - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
JF - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
IS - 13
ER -