Combined N-of-1 trials to investigate mexiletine in non-dystrophic myotonia using a Bayesian approach; study rationale and protocol

Bas C. Stunnenberg, Willem Woertman, Joost Raaphorst, Jeffrey M. Statland, Robert C. Griggs, Janneke Timmermans, Christiaan G. Saris, Bas J. Schouwenberg, Hans M. Groenewoud, Dick F. Stegeman, Baziel G.M. van Engelen, Gea Drost, Gert Jan van der Wilt

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: To obtain evidence for the clinical and cost-effectiveness of treatments for patients with rare diseases is a challenge. Non-dystrophic myotonia (NDM) is a group of inherited, rare muscle diseases characterized by muscle stiffness. The reimbursement of mexiletine, the expert opinion drug for NDM, has been discontinued in some countries due to a lack of independent randomized controlled trials (RCTs). It remains unclear however, which concessions can be accepted towards the level 1 evidence needed for coverage decisions, in rare diseases. Considering the large number of rare diseases with a lack of treatment evidence, more experience with innovative trial designs is needed. Both NDM and mexiletine are well suited for an N-of-1 trial design. A Bayesian approach allows for the combination of N-of-1 trials, which enables the assessment of outcomes on the patient and group level simultaneously. Methods/Design: We will combine 30 individual, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled N-of-1 trials of mexiletine (600 mg daily) vs. placebo in genetically confirmed NDM patients using hierarchical Bayesian modeling. Our results will be compared and combined with the main results of an international cross-over RCT (mexiletine vs. placebo in NDM) published in 2012 that will be used as an informative prior. Similar criteria of eligibility, treatment regimen, end-points and measurement instruments are employed as used in the international cross-over RCT. Discussion: The treatment of patients with NDM with mexiletine offers a unique opportunity to compare outcomes and efficiency of novel N-of-1 trial-based designs and conventional approaches in producing evidence of clinical and cost-effectiveness of treatments for patients with rare diseases.

Original languageEnglish
Article number43
JournalBMC neurology
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Mar 2015

Keywords

  • Bayesian
  • Combined N-of-1 trials
  • Mexiletine
  • Non-dystrophic myotonia
  • Rare diseases
  • Skeletal muscle channelopathies

Cite this