Communication about prognosis during patient-initiated second opinion consultations in advanced cancer care: An observational qualitative analysis

N. C. A. van der Velden, M. B. A. van der Kleij, V. Lehmann, E. M. A. Smets, J. M. L. Stouthard, I. Henselmans, M. A. Hillen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prognostic communication is essential for patients with advanced cancer to enable informed medical decision-making and end-of-life planning. Discussing prognosis is challenging, and might be especially complex for oncologists conducting a second opinion (SO). Survival data are often lacking, and consulting oncologists need to consider previously conveyed information and patients’ relationship with the referring oncologist. We qualitatively investigated how advanced cancer patients and consulting oncologists discuss prognosis during audio-recorded SO consultations (N = 60), including prognostic information received from the referring oncologist. Our results show that patients regularly expressed implicit cues to discuss prognosis or posed explicit questions tentatively. Consulting oncologists were mostly unresponsive to patients’ cues and cautious to prognosticate. They also seemed cautious when patients brought up the referring oncologist. Consulting oncologists checked which prognostic information patients had received from the referring oncologist, before estimating prognosis. They agreed with the first opinion or rectified discrepancies carefully. Altogether, this study exposes missed opportunities for open prognostic discussions in SOs. Consulting oncologists could explicitly explore patients’ information preferences and perceptions of prognosis. If desired, they can provide tailored, independent information to optimise patients’ prognostic awareness and informed medical decision-making. They may additionally support patients in dealing with prognosis and the uncertainties associated with it.
Original languageEnglish
Article number5694
JournalInternational journal of environmental research and public health
Volume18
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2021

Keywords

  • Advanced cancer
  • Medical decision making
  • Palliative care
  • Physician-patient communication
  • Physician-patient relations
  • Prognosis
  • Quality of care
  • Referral and consultation
  • Second opinions
  • Truth disclosure

Cite this