TY - JOUR
T1 - Contributions of changes in physical activity, sedentary time, diet and body weight to changes in cardiometabolic risk
AU - Andersen, Eivind
AU - van der Ploeg, Hidde P.
AU - van Mechelen, Willem
AU - Gray, Cindy M.
AU - Mutrie, Nanette
AU - van Nassau, Femke
AU - Jelsma, Judith G. M.
AU - Anderson, Annie S.
AU - Silva, Marlene N.
AU - Pereira, Hugo V.
AU - McConnachie, Alex
AU - Sattar, Naveed
AU - Sørensen, Marit
AU - Røynesdal, Øystein B.
AU - Hunt, Kate
AU - Roberts, Glyn C.
AU - Wyke, Sally
AU - Gill, Jason M. R.
N1 - Funding Information: We are grateful to participants, coaches and club managers at 15 football clubs, without whom this project would not have been possible. We also thank the valued members of the EuroFIT consortium for their important contributions to the project: Christopher Bunn, Paula McSkimming, Spyros Kolovos, Judith Bosmans, Sharon Kean, Nicolas Lemyre, David W. Loudon, Lisa Macaulay, Douglas J. Maxwell, Alex McConnachie,IMaria Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Matthew Philpott, John Rooksby, Marit S?rensen, Pedro J. Teixeira, Shaun Treweek, Theo van Achterberg, Irene van de Glind. Funding Information: The research was funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Program for research technological development and demonstration under Grant Agreement no: 602170. The funder had no role in the study’s design or conduct; data collection, management, analysis or interpretation; manuscript preparation, review or approval. Views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union. Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/12/20
Y1 - 2021/12/20
N2 - Background: Increased physical activity (PA), reduced time spent sedentary (SED), healthier diet and reduced body weight may all have a positive impact on cardiometabolic risk. The relative importance of change in each of these variables on cardiometabolic risk, however, is unclear. We therefore sought to investigate the relative contributions of changes in PA, SED, diet and body weight on cardiometabolic risk. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of data collected from the EuroFIT randomised controlled trial, which was a 12-week group-based lifestyle intervention for overweight middle-aged men delivered by coaches in football club stadia aiming to improve PA, SED, diet, and body weight. PA and SED were assessed by accelerometry, diet using the Dietary Instrument for Nutrition Education (DINE). An overall cardiometabolic risk score was derived from combining z-scores for glucose, HbA1c, insulin, lipids and blood pressure. In total, 707 men (from the overall cohort of 1113) with complete data for these variables at baseline and 12-month follow-up were included in the multivariable linear regression analyses. Results: In multivariable analyses, change in number of steps (explaining 5.1% of R2) and dietary factors (less alcohol, fatty and sugary food, and more fruit and vegetables) (together explaining 4.5% of R2), but not changes in standing time or SED, were significantly associated with change in body weight. Changes in number of steps (R2 = 1.7%), fatty food score (R2 = 2.4%), and sugary food score (R2 = 0.4%) were significantly associated with change in cardiometabolic risk score in univariable models. However, in multivariable models which included changes in weight as well as changes in steps and dietary variables, change in weight explained a substantially larger proportion of the change in cardiometabolic risk score, explaining 14.1% of R2 (out of an overall model R2 of 19.0%). When baseline (as well as change) values were also included in the model, 38.8% of R2 for change in cardiometabolic risk score was explained overall, with 14.1% of R2 still explained by change in weight. Conclusion: Change in body weight, together with baseline cardiometabolic risk explained most of the change in cardiometabolic risk. Thus, the benefits of increasing physical activity and improving diet on cardiometabolic risk appear to act largely via an effect on changes in body weight. Trial registration: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials, ISRCTN-81935608. Registered 06052015. https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN81935608?q=&filters=recruitmentCountry:Portugal&sort=&offset=7&totalResults=92&page=1&pageSize=10&searchType=basic-search.
AB - Background: Increased physical activity (PA), reduced time spent sedentary (SED), healthier diet and reduced body weight may all have a positive impact on cardiometabolic risk. The relative importance of change in each of these variables on cardiometabolic risk, however, is unclear. We therefore sought to investigate the relative contributions of changes in PA, SED, diet and body weight on cardiometabolic risk. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of data collected from the EuroFIT randomised controlled trial, which was a 12-week group-based lifestyle intervention for overweight middle-aged men delivered by coaches in football club stadia aiming to improve PA, SED, diet, and body weight. PA and SED were assessed by accelerometry, diet using the Dietary Instrument for Nutrition Education (DINE). An overall cardiometabolic risk score was derived from combining z-scores for glucose, HbA1c, insulin, lipids and blood pressure. In total, 707 men (from the overall cohort of 1113) with complete data for these variables at baseline and 12-month follow-up were included in the multivariable linear regression analyses. Results: In multivariable analyses, change in number of steps (explaining 5.1% of R2) and dietary factors (less alcohol, fatty and sugary food, and more fruit and vegetables) (together explaining 4.5% of R2), but not changes in standing time or SED, were significantly associated with change in body weight. Changes in number of steps (R2 = 1.7%), fatty food score (R2 = 2.4%), and sugary food score (R2 = 0.4%) were significantly associated with change in cardiometabolic risk score in univariable models. However, in multivariable models which included changes in weight as well as changes in steps and dietary variables, change in weight explained a substantially larger proportion of the change in cardiometabolic risk score, explaining 14.1% of R2 (out of an overall model R2 of 19.0%). When baseline (as well as change) values were also included in the model, 38.8% of R2 for change in cardiometabolic risk score was explained overall, with 14.1% of R2 still explained by change in weight. Conclusion: Change in body weight, together with baseline cardiometabolic risk explained most of the change in cardiometabolic risk. Thus, the benefits of increasing physical activity and improving diet on cardiometabolic risk appear to act largely via an effect on changes in body weight. Trial registration: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials, ISRCTN-81935608. Registered 06052015. https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN81935608?q=&filters=recruitmentCountry:Portugal&sort=&offset=7&totalResults=92&page=1&pageSize=10&searchType=basic-search.
KW - Cardiovascular health
KW - body weight
KW - physical activity
KW - sedentary time
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121465390&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01237-1
DO - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01237-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 34930299
SN - 1479-5868
VL - 18
JO - international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity
JF - international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity
IS - 1
M1 - 166
ER -