TY - JOUR
T1 - Cosmetic outcome and quality of life are inextricably linked in breast-conserving therapy
AU - Volders, José H.
AU - Negenborn, Vera L.
AU - Haloua, Max H.
AU - Krekel, Nicole M.A.
AU - Jóźwiak, Katarzyna
AU - Meijer, Sybren
AU - M. van den Tol, Petrousjka
PY - 2017/6/15
Y1 - 2017/6/15
N2 - Introduction: Cosmetic results and quality of life (QoL) are increasingly important in the treatment of breast cancer. This study was designed to determine the relationship between QoL and both subjectively and objectively measured cosmetic outcomes of breast-conserving therapy (BCT), and its course over time. Methods: A total of 128 breast cancer patients who underwent BCT as part of a prospective randomized controlled trial were included. QoL was measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 36 months. Cosmetic outcome was determined by patient self-evaluation, panel evaluation, and BCCT.core software. Results: By 36 months, all QoL factors except arm symptoms had returned to baseline or improved. After adjustment for patient and tumor characteristics, a significantly better QoL in terms of body image, pain, and arm and breast symptoms was found for good/excellent cosmetic outcomes compared to fair/poor outcomes, as measured by both patient self-evaluation and panel evaluation. The BCCT.core showed no correlation with any QoL factors. Conclusion: There is a high correlation between poor cosmetic outcome and low scores on quality of life indicators, underlining the importance of achieving a good cosmetic outcome after BCT.
AB - Introduction: Cosmetic results and quality of life (QoL) are increasingly important in the treatment of breast cancer. This study was designed to determine the relationship between QoL and both subjectively and objectively measured cosmetic outcomes of breast-conserving therapy (BCT), and its course over time. Methods: A total of 128 breast cancer patients who underwent BCT as part of a prospective randomized controlled trial were included. QoL was measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 36 months. Cosmetic outcome was determined by patient self-evaluation, panel evaluation, and BCCT.core software. Results: By 36 months, all QoL factors except arm symptoms had returned to baseline or improved. After adjustment for patient and tumor characteristics, a significantly better QoL in terms of body image, pain, and arm and breast symptoms was found for good/excellent cosmetic outcomes compared to fair/poor outcomes, as measured by both patient self-evaluation and panel evaluation. The BCCT.core showed no correlation with any QoL factors. Conclusion: There is a high correlation between poor cosmetic outcome and low scores on quality of life indicators, underlining the importance of achieving a good cosmetic outcome after BCT.
KW - breast cancer
KW - breast-conserving therapy
KW - cosmetic outcome
KW - quality of life
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017182436&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24615
DO - https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24615
M3 - Article
C2 - 28334419
SN - 0022-4790
VL - 115
SP - 941
EP - 948
JO - Journal of surgical oncology
JF - Journal of surgical oncology
IS - 8
ER -