TY - JOUR
T1 - Counselling for prenatal anomaly screening to migrant women in the Netherlands
T2 - An interview study of primary care midwives’ perceived barriers with client– midwife communication
AU - Koopmanschap, Isabel
AU - Martin, Linda
AU - van der Wal, Janneke T. Gitsels
AU - Suurmond, Jeanine
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022. Koopmanschap I. et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - INTRODUCTION Large ethnic inequalities exist in the prenatal screening offer, counselling, informed decision-making, and uptake of prenatal anomaly tests. More insight into midwives’ experiences with offering prenatal counselling to migrant women may provide better insight into the origins and consequences of these ethnic inequalities. METHODS We conducted interviews with 12 midwives certified as counsellors for prenatal anomaly screening for women they identified as migrants. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Midwives reported most diflculties in communicating with women of ‘nonwestern migrant background’, which include firstand second-generation migrants from Africa, Latin-America, Asia, and Turkey. They experienced barriers in communication related to linguistics, health literacy, sociocultural and religious differences, with midwife stereotyping affecting all three aspects of counselling: health education, decisionmaking support, and the client–midwife relation. Health education was diflcult because of language barriers and low health-literacy of clients, decision-making support was hampered by sociocultural and religious midwife–client differences, and client–midwife relations were under pressure due to sociocultural and religious midwife–client differences and midwife stereotyping. CONCLUSIONS Barriers to optimal communication seem to contribute to suboptimal counselling, especially for women of ‘non-western migrant background’. Client–midwife communication thus potentially adds to the ethnic disparities observed in the offer of and informed decision-making about prenatal anomaly screening in the Netherlands. The quality of prenatal counselling for women from all ethnic backgrounds might be improved by addressing linguistic, health literacy, sociocultural and religious barriers in future training and continuing education of prenatal counsellors.
AB - INTRODUCTION Large ethnic inequalities exist in the prenatal screening offer, counselling, informed decision-making, and uptake of prenatal anomaly tests. More insight into midwives’ experiences with offering prenatal counselling to migrant women may provide better insight into the origins and consequences of these ethnic inequalities. METHODS We conducted interviews with 12 midwives certified as counsellors for prenatal anomaly screening for women they identified as migrants. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Midwives reported most diflculties in communicating with women of ‘nonwestern migrant background’, which include firstand second-generation migrants from Africa, Latin-America, Asia, and Turkey. They experienced barriers in communication related to linguistics, health literacy, sociocultural and religious differences, with midwife stereotyping affecting all three aspects of counselling: health education, decisionmaking support, and the client–midwife relation. Health education was diflcult because of language barriers and low health-literacy of clients, decision-making support was hampered by sociocultural and religious midwife–client differences, and client–midwife relations were under pressure due to sociocultural and religious midwife–client differences and midwife stereotyping. CONCLUSIONS Barriers to optimal communication seem to contribute to suboptimal counselling, especially for women of ‘non-western migrant background’. Client–midwife communication thus potentially adds to the ethnic disparities observed in the offer of and informed decision-making about prenatal anomaly screening in the Netherlands. The quality of prenatal counselling for women from all ethnic backgrounds might be improved by addressing linguistic, health literacy, sociocultural and religious barriers in future training and continuing education of prenatal counsellors.
KW - Genetic counselling
KW - clientmidwife communication
KW - ethnic inequalities
KW - midwives’ experiences
KW - migrant pregnant women
KW - prenatal diagnosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131396071&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/147911
DO - https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/147911
M3 - Article
C2 - 35633755
SN - 2585-2906
VL - 6
JO - European journal of midwifery
JF - European journal of midwifery
IS - May
M1 - 29
ER -