TY - JOUR
T1 - Course of objective memory impairment in non-demented subjects attending a memory clinic and predictors of outcome
AU - Visser, Pieter Jelle
AU - Verhey, Frans R.J.
AU - Ponds, Rudolf W.H.M.
AU - Cruts, Marc
AU - Van Broeckhoven, Christine L.
AU - Jolles, Jellemer
PY - 2000/4/1
Y1 - 2000/4/1
N2 - The aim of the study was to investigate the course of objective memory impairment in non-demented subjects who attended a memory clinic and to test predictors of outcome. Non-demented subjects (N = 74) were included when they were older than 40 years and had a baseline score on the delayed recall of a word learning test below the tenth percentile. Subjects with memory impairment due to known somatic or neurological causes were excluded. The subjects were reassessed after 2 and 5 years. At the 5-year follow-up, 42% of the subjects had no memory impairment, 19% of the subjects had memory impairment without dementia, and 39% of the subjects had Alzheimer type dementia (AD). Predictors at baseline of reversible memory impairment in a multivariate analysis were age, scores on the MMSE and delayed recall, and the degree of functional impairment. Predictors at baseline of AD in a multivariate analysis were age and the score on the MMSE. The apolipoprotein E genotype and the presence of depression at baseline were not predictors of outcome. The positive predictive value was 72% for reversible memory impairment and 81% for AD. Memory impairment is often reversible and therefore its presence alone is not sufficient to consider subjects as preclinically demented. Predictive accuracy can be increased by including simple measures such as age, the scores on the MMSE and delayed recall, and the degree of functional impairment. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
AB - The aim of the study was to investigate the course of objective memory impairment in non-demented subjects who attended a memory clinic and to test predictors of outcome. Non-demented subjects (N = 74) were included when they were older than 40 years and had a baseline score on the delayed recall of a word learning test below the tenth percentile. Subjects with memory impairment due to known somatic or neurological causes were excluded. The subjects were reassessed after 2 and 5 years. At the 5-year follow-up, 42% of the subjects had no memory impairment, 19% of the subjects had memory impairment without dementia, and 39% of the subjects had Alzheimer type dementia (AD). Predictors at baseline of reversible memory impairment in a multivariate analysis were age, scores on the MMSE and delayed recall, and the degree of functional impairment. Predictors at baseline of AD in a multivariate analysis were age and the score on the MMSE. The apolipoprotein E genotype and the presence of depression at baseline were not predictors of outcome. The positive predictive value was 72% for reversible memory impairment and 81% for AD. Memory impairment is often reversible and therefore its presence alone is not sufficient to consider subjects as preclinically demented. Predictive accuracy can be increased by including simple measures such as age, the scores on the MMSE and delayed recall, and the degree of functional impairment. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
KW - Alzheimer's disease
KW - Cognitive impairment no dementia (CIND)
KW - Longitudinal
KW - Memory impairment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034021324&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(200004)15:4<363::AID-GPS129>3.0.CO;2-4
DO - https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(200004)15:4<363::AID-GPS129>3.0.CO;2-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 10767737
SN - 0885-6230
VL - 15
SP - 363
EP - 372
JO - International journal of geriatric psychiatry
JF - International journal of geriatric psychiatry
IS - 4
ER -