TY - JOUR
T1 - Cytogenetics in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
T2 - ERIC Perspectives and Recommendations
AU - Baliakas, Panagiotis
AU - Espinet, Blanca
AU - Mellink, Clemens
AU - Jarosova, Marie
AU - Athanasiadou, Anastasia
AU - Ghia, Paolo
AU - Kater, Arnon P.
AU - Oscier, David
AU - Haferlach, Claudia
AU - Stamatopoulos, Kostas
N1 - Funding Information: Supported in part by the Hellenic Precision Medicine Network in Oncology; MJ CZ - DRO (FNBr, 65269705), the research projects MZ ČR AZV NV19-03-00091, NU20-08-00314 and MZ ČR AZV NU21-08-00237; Lion’s Cancer Research Foundation, Uppsala and Generalitat de Catalunya (17SGR437). Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/4/25
Y1 - 2022/4/25
N2 - Mounting evidence underscores the clinical value of cytogenetic analysis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), particularly as it allows the identification of complex karyotype, that has recently emerged as a prognostic and potentially predictive biomarker. That said, explicit recommendations regarding the methodology and clinical interpretation of either chromosome banding analysis (CBA) or chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) are still lacking. We herein present the consensus of the Cytogenetic Steering Scientific Committee of ERIC, the European Research Initiative on CLL, regarding methodological issues as well as clinical interpretation of CBA/CMA and discuss their relevance in CLL. ERIC considers CBA standardized and feasible for CLL on the condition that standards are met, extending from the use of novel mitogens to the accurate interpretation of the findings. On the other hand, CMA, is also standardized, however, robust data on its clinical utility are still scarce. In conclusion, cytogenetic analysis is not yet mature enough to guide treatment choices in CLL. That notwithstanding, ERIC encourages the wide application of CBA, and potentially also CMA, in clinical trials in order to obtain robust evidence regarding the predictive value of specific cytogenetic profiles towards refining risk stratification and improving the management of patients with CLL.
AB - Mounting evidence underscores the clinical value of cytogenetic analysis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), particularly as it allows the identification of complex karyotype, that has recently emerged as a prognostic and potentially predictive biomarker. That said, explicit recommendations regarding the methodology and clinical interpretation of either chromosome banding analysis (CBA) or chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) are still lacking. We herein present the consensus of the Cytogenetic Steering Scientific Committee of ERIC, the European Research Initiative on CLL, regarding methodological issues as well as clinical interpretation of CBA/CMA and discuss their relevance in CLL. ERIC considers CBA standardized and feasible for CLL on the condition that standards are met, extending from the use of novel mitogens to the accurate interpretation of the findings. On the other hand, CMA, is also standardized, however, robust data on its clinical utility are still scarce. In conclusion, cytogenetic analysis is not yet mature enough to guide treatment choices in CLL. That notwithstanding, ERIC encourages the wide application of CBA, and potentially also CMA, in clinical trials in order to obtain robust evidence regarding the predictive value of specific cytogenetic profiles towards refining risk stratification and improving the management of patients with CLL.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127666325&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000707
DO - https://doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000707
M3 - Article
C2 - 35392482
SN - 2572-9241
VL - 6
SP - E707
JO - HemaSphere
JF - HemaSphere
IS - 4
ER -