TY - JOUR
T1 - Declined Organs for Liver Transplantation
T2 - A Right Decision or a Missed Opportunity for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma?
AU - Lozanovski, Vladimir J.
AU - Adigozalov, Said
AU - Khajeh, Elias
AU - Ghamarnejad, Omid
AU - Aminizadeh, Ehsan
AU - Schleicher, Christina
AU - Hackert, Thilo
AU - Müller-Stich, Beat Peter
AU - Merle, Uta
AU - Picardi, Susanne
AU - Lund, Frederike
AU - Chang, De-Hua
AU - Mieth, Markus
AU - Fonouni, Hamidreza
AU - Golriz, Mohammad
AU - Mehrabi, Arianeb
N1 - Funding Information: The study received no external funding. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023/3/1
Y1 - 2023/3/1
N2 - Background: Liver transplantation is the only promising treatment for end-stage liver disease and patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. However, too many organs are rejected for transplantation. Methods: We analyzed the factors involved in organ allocation in our transplant center and reviewed all livers that were declined for transplantation. Reasons for declining organs for transplantation were categorized as major extended donor criteria (maEDC), size mismatch and vascular problems, medical reasons and risk of disease transmission, and other reasons. The fate of the declined organs was analyzed. Results: 1086 declined organs were offered 1200 times. A total of 31% of the livers were declined because of maEDC, 35.5% because of size mismatch and vascular problems, 15.8% because of medical reasons and risk of disease transmission, and 20.7% because of other reasons. A total of 40% of the declined organs were allocated and transplanted. A total of 50% of the organs were completely discarded, and significantly more of these grafts had maEDC than grafts that were eventually allocated (37.5% vs. 17.7%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Most organs were declined because of poor organ quality. Donor-recipient matching at time of allocation and organ preservation must be improved by allocating maEDC grafts using individualized algorithms that avoid high-risk donor-recipient combinations and unnecessary organ declination.
AB - Background: Liver transplantation is the only promising treatment for end-stage liver disease and patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. However, too many organs are rejected for transplantation. Methods: We analyzed the factors involved in organ allocation in our transplant center and reviewed all livers that were declined for transplantation. Reasons for declining organs for transplantation were categorized as major extended donor criteria (maEDC), size mismatch and vascular problems, medical reasons and risk of disease transmission, and other reasons. The fate of the declined organs was analyzed. Results: 1086 declined organs were offered 1200 times. A total of 31% of the livers were declined because of maEDC, 35.5% because of size mismatch and vascular problems, 15.8% because of medical reasons and risk of disease transmission, and 20.7% because of other reasons. A total of 40% of the declined organs were allocated and transplanted. A total of 50% of the organs were completely discarded, and significantly more of these grafts had maEDC than grafts that were eventually allocated (37.5% vs. 17.7%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Most organs were declined because of poor organ quality. Donor-recipient matching at time of allocation and organ preservation must be improved by allocating maEDC grafts using individualized algorithms that avoid high-risk donor-recipient combinations and unnecessary organ declination.
KW - Eurotransplant
KW - HCC
KW - MELD
KW - declined organs
KW - extended donor criteria
KW - extended right lobe liver transplantation
KW - hepatocellular carcinoma
KW - liver transplantation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149886160&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15051365
DO - https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15051365
M3 - Article
C2 - 36900157
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 15
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 5
M1 - 1365
ER -