Determinants of instrumented sedentary and physical activity behavior in geriatric rehabilitation inpatients: RESORT: RESORT

Anna Galina Maria Rojer, Britt C.M. Denneman, Puck Brouwer, Keenan A. Ramsey, Marijke C. Trappenburg, Carel G.M. Meskers, Mirjam Pijnappels, Rose Goonan, Celia Marston, Jacqueline E. Kay, W. Kwang Lim, Alisa Turbić, Louis Island, Esmee M. Reijnierse, Andrea B. Maier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Physical inactivity in hospitalized older adults is highly prevalent and associated with detrimental health outcomes. Understanding its determinants is important for prognosis and tailoring interventions in geriatric rehabilitation inpatients. Methods: Within the REStORing health of acutely unwell adulTs (RESORT) observational, longitudinal cohort, geriatric rehabilitation inpatients wore an inertial sensor (ActivPAL4) for one week to objectively assess instrumented sedentary behavior (i-SB) and physical activity (i-PA). Determinants were grouped in five geriatric domains: morbidity, cognition/psychology, physical performance, functional performance, and nutritional status. Their association with i-SB (mean sitting, lying, non-upright time) and i-PA (mean number of steps, sit-to-stand transitions and upright time) quintiles were examined using multivariate ordinal logistic regression analyses with Bonferroni correction (p < 0.006). Results: A total of 145 inpatients were included (mean age 83.0, SD 7.7 years; 55.9% females). More comorbidities were associated with a lower daily number of steps (OR:0.91, 95%CI: 0.86–0.96) and lower upright time (OR:0.93, 95%CI: 0.88–0.98). Depressive symptoms (higher Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score) were associated with higher non-upright time (OR: 1.12, 95%CI: 1.03–1.21) and lower upright time (OR: 0.89, 95%CI: 0.83–0.96). Better physical performance (higher Functional Ambulation Classification, gait speed, and Short Physical Performance Battery score) was associated with lower i-SB measures (OR range: 0.07–0.78, p < 0.0005) and higher i-PA measures (OR range: 1.35–19.50, p < 0.0005). Higher functional performance (Katz index of Activities of Daily Living score) was associated with lower i-SB measures (OR range: 0.61–0.69, p ≤ 0.003) and higher i-PA measures (OR range: 1.60–3.64, p < 0.0005). Being malnourished was associated with lower i-PA measures (OR range: 0.29–0.32, p ≤ 0.004). Conclusions: Worse morbidity, depressive symptoms, worse physical and functional performance, and worse nutritional status were associated with higher i-SB and lower i-PA. These determinants should be taken into account while designing and promoting multidisciplinary physical activity interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number111524
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalExperimental gerontology
Volume154
Early online date21 Aug 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Oct 2021

Keywords

  • Accelerometry
  • Geriatric assessment
  • Motor activity
  • Physical functional performance
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this