Development of a stage-dependent prognostic model to predict psychosis in ultra-high-risk patients seeking treatment for co-morbid psychiatric disorders: Psychological Medicine

Helga K. Ising, S. Ruhrmann, Nafm Burger, J. Rietdijk, S. Dragt, Rianne M. C. Klaassen, David P. G. van den Berg, Dorien H. Nieman, N. Boonstra, Don H. Linszen, L. Wunderink, F. Smit, W. Veling, M. van der Gaag

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)


Background. Current ultra-high-risk (UHR) criteria appear insufficient to predict imminent onset of first-episode psychosis, as a meta-analysis showed that about 20% of patients have a psychotic outcome after 2 years. Therefore, we aimed to develop a stage-dependent predictive model in UHR individuals who were seeking help for co-morbid disorders. Method. Baseline data on symptomatology, and environmental and psychological factors of 185 UHR patients (aged 1435 years) participating in the Dutch Early Detection and Intervention Evaluation study were analysed with Cox proportional hazard analyses. Results. At 18 months, the overall transition rate was 17.3%. The final predictor model included five variables: observed blunted affect [hazard ratio (HR) 3.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.56-7.35, p <0.001], subjective complaints of impaired motor function (HR 5.88, 95% CI 1.21-6.10, p = 0.02), beliefs about social marginalization (HR 2.76, 95% CI 1.14-6.72, p = 0.03), decline in social functioning (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.17, p = 0.03), and distress associated with suspiciousness (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.03, p = 0.01). The positive predictive value of the model was 80.0%. The resulting prognostic index stratified the general risk into three risk classes with significantly different survival curves. In the highest risk class, transition to psychosis emerged on average 58 months earlier than in the lowest risk class. Conclusions. Predicting a first-episode psychosis in help-seeking UHR patients was improved using a stage-dependent prognostic model including negative psychotic symptoms (observed flattened affect, subjective impaired motor functioning), impaired social functioning and distress associated with suspiciousness. Treatment intensity may be stratified and personalized using the risk stratification.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1839-1851
Number of pages13
JournalPsychological Medicine
Issue number46
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Cite this