Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography inter-eye percentage difference for optic neuritis in multiple sclerosis

D. Coric, L. J. Balk, B. M.J. Uitdehaag, A. Petzold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)


Background and purpose: Multiple sclerosis-associated optic neuritis (MSON) causes atrophy of the inner retinal layers, which can be quantified by optical coherence tomography. It has been suggested that the inter-eye percentage difference (IEPD) of atrophy may be of diagnostic value in MSON. Methods: This was a prospective, cross-sectional study in patients with multiple sclerosis and healthy controls (HCs). Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of both eyes was performed, followed by automated retinal layer segmentation of the peri-papillary retinal nerve fibre layer (pRNFL) and macular ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL). Receiver operator characteristics curves were plotted and the area under the curve was calculated for group comparisons of the IEPD of the pRNFL and mGCIPL. Results: There were 39 patients with bilateral MSON, 62 patients with unilateral MSON, 106 patients without MSON and 63 HCs. Diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve) of the IEPD was 0.73–0.86 for the pRNFL and 0.75–0.94 for the mGCIPL. The diagnostic sensitivity of the mGCIPL IEPD was 70% with a specificity of 97% for distinguishing unilateral MSON from HCs. For the comparison of bilateral MSON with HCs, sensitivity was 86% with a specificity of 97%. Conclusions: The IEPD of the pRNFL, and more particularly the IEPD of the mGCIPL, is a useful diagnostic measure for MSON. The IEPD is a dimensionless unit and may therefore contribute to overcome device and proprietary segmentation algorithm limitations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1479-1484
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean journal of neurology
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017


  • diagnostic criteria
  • multiple sclerosis
  • optic neuritis
  • optical coherence tomography

Cite this