TY - JOUR
T1 - Dietary intake, eating behavior, physical activity, and quality of life in infertile women with pcos and obesity compared with non-pcos obese controls
AU - Wang, Zheng
AU - Groen, Henk
AU - Cantineau, Astrid E. P.
AU - van Elten, Tessa M.
AU - Karsten, Matty D. A.
AU - van Oers, Anne M.
AU - Mol, Ben W. J.
AU - Roseboom, Tessa J.
AU - Hoek, Annemieke
N1 - Funding Information: Conflicts of Interest: The department of obstetrics and gynecology of the UMCG received an unrestricted educational grant from Ferring Pharmaceuticals BV, The Netherlands. B.W.J.M. was supported by a NHMRC Investigator grant (GNT1176437). B.W.J.M. reports consultancy for Guerbet, has been a member of the ObsEva advisory board, and holds stock options for ObsEva. B.W.J.M. received research funding from Guerbet, Ferring, and Merck. ZonMw had no role in the data collection, analysis, interpretation of the data, or writing the report. Funding Information: Funding: This trial was funded by ZonMw (Prevention program—Health Care Efficiency Research; project number 50-50110-96-518). Funding Information: This trial was funded by ZonMw (Prevention program?Health Care Efficiency Research; project number 50-50110-96-518). We would like to thank the women who participated in this study. We would like to acknowledge A. Bolster (University Medical Center Groningen) as the senior trainer of the intervention coaches. We thank all the lifestyle coaches, research nurses, research midwives, and office members of the Dutch Consortium 2.0 (www.studies-obsgyn.nl, accessed on 9 September 2021) for their hard work and dedication. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/10/1
Y1 - 2021/10/1
N2 - To personalize lifestyle advice for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and obesity, detailed information regarding dietary intake, eating behavior, physical activity levels, and quality of life (QoL) may be useful. We aimed to investigate in a post-hoc cross-sectional analysis within a large multicenter randomized controlled trial in women with infertility whether there are significant differences in dietary intake (vegetables, fruits, sugary drinks, alcoholic beverages, savory snacks, and sweet snacks); eating behavior (emotional eating, external eating, and restricted eating); physical activity; and QoL between women with PCOS and obesity and non-PCOS obese controls. Participants were asked to complete the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ), the Short QUestionnaire to ASsess Health-enhancing physical activity (SQUASH), and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at study entry (PCOS: n = 170; non-PCOS: n = 321, mean BMI: 36). Linear and binary (multinomial) logistic regressions were used, and the analyses were adjusted for age, waist–hip circumference ratio, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). No statistically significant differences in dietary intake or physical activity were observed between the two groups. The overall score of emotional eating was 34.6 ± 11.2 in the PCOS group and 34.1 ± 11.3 in the non-PCOS group (p = 0.11). QoL scores (physical and mental) did not differ between PCOS and non-PCOS women. These findings suggest that infertile women with PCOS and obesity and infertile non-PCOS obese controls do not have different dietary habits and have similar mental and physical QoL.
AB - To personalize lifestyle advice for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and obesity, detailed information regarding dietary intake, eating behavior, physical activity levels, and quality of life (QoL) may be useful. We aimed to investigate in a post-hoc cross-sectional analysis within a large multicenter randomized controlled trial in women with infertility whether there are significant differences in dietary intake (vegetables, fruits, sugary drinks, alcoholic beverages, savory snacks, and sweet snacks); eating behavior (emotional eating, external eating, and restricted eating); physical activity; and QoL between women with PCOS and obesity and non-PCOS obese controls. Participants were asked to complete the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ), the Short QUestionnaire to ASsess Health-enhancing physical activity (SQUASH), and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at study entry (PCOS: n = 170; non-PCOS: n = 321, mean BMI: 36). Linear and binary (multinomial) logistic regressions were used, and the analyses were adjusted for age, waist–hip circumference ratio, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). No statistically significant differences in dietary intake or physical activity were observed between the two groups. The overall score of emotional eating was 34.6 ± 11.2 in the PCOS group and 34.1 ± 11.3 in the non-PCOS group (p = 0.11). QoL scores (physical and mental) did not differ between PCOS and non-PCOS women. These findings suggest that infertile women with PCOS and obesity and infertile non-PCOS obese controls do not have different dietary habits and have similar mental and physical QoL.
KW - Dietary intake
KW - Eating behavior
KW - Obesity
KW - PCOS
KW - Physical activity
KW - Quality of life
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116522429&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13103526
DO - https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13103526
M3 - Article
C2 - 34684528
SN - 2072-6643
VL - 13
JO - NUTRIENTS
JF - NUTRIENTS
IS - 10
M1 - 3526
ER -