Diffusion-weighted imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma before and after transarterial chemoembolization: role in survival prediction and response evaluation

Tim A. Labeur, Jurgen H. Runge, Elisabeth G. Klompenhouwer, Heinz-Josef Klümpen, R. Bart Takkenberg, Otto M. van Delden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Survival outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) are heterogeneous. Measuring the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) may improve overall survival prediction. Aim: To assess the value of measuring the ADC before and after TACE in predicting overall survival. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in HCC patients treated with TACE at a tertiary referral center between 2008 and 2017. The ADC values and changes in ADC value (ΔADC) of HCC lesions (≥ 1 cm) and liver parenchyma were assessed by DWI ≤ 3 months before and after first TACE. Pre- and post-TACE ADC values were compared with tumor response according to mRECIST and correlated with overall survival (OS) in a univariable and multivariable Cox-regression analysis. Results: A total of 89 patients were included, mostly Child–Pugh A (85%) and BCLC stage B (53%) with a median OS of 21.7 months (95% CI 17.6–25.9). Tumor ADC increased from 1081 mm 2 /s before (IQR 964–1225) to 1328 mm 2 /s (IQR 1197–1560) after TACE (p < 0.001). Responders according to mRECIST showed a higher ΔADC after first TACE than non-responders (26 vs. 14%, p = 0.048). Pre-TACE ADC and ΔADC were not significantly associated with OS in both univariable and multivariable analysis, whereas response according to mRECIST remained an independent predictor of OS. Conclusion: mRECIST was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor of OS, but pre- or post-TACE ADC measurements were not. Response according to mRECIST was associated with a higher increase in ADC than non-response.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2740-2750
JournalAbdominal Radiology
Volume44
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2019

Cite this