TY - JOUR
T1 - Direct and indirect costs associated with nonoperative treatment for shoulder instability
T2 - an observational study in 132 patients
AU - van der Linde, Just A.
AU - Bosmans, Judith E.
AU - ter Meulen, Dirk P.
AU - van Kampen, Derk A.
AU - van Deurzen, Derek F.P.
AU - Haverlag, Robert
AU - Saris, Daniel B.F.
AU - van den Bekerom, Michel P.J.
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - Background: Shoulder instability is associated with decreased functioning. The associated costs could be substantial and interesting to clinicians, researchers, and policy makers. This prospective observational study aims to (1) estimate productivity losses and healthcare expenses following the nonoperative treatment of shoulder instability and (2) identify patient characteristics that influence societal costs. Methods: One hundred and thirty-two patients completed a questionnaire regarding production losses and healthcare utilization following consecutive episodes of shoulder instability. Productivity losses were calculated using the friction cost approach. Healthcare utilization was evaluated using standard costs. analysis of variance test was used to assess which patient characteristics are related to productivity losses and healthcare expenses. Societal costs were assessed using multilevel analyses. Bootstrapping was used to estimate statistical uncertainty. Results: Mean productivity losses are €1469, €881, and €728 and mean healthcare expenses are €3759, €3267, and €2424 per patient per dislocation for the first, second, and third dislocation. Productivity losses decrease significantly after the second (mean difference €−1969, 95%CI= −3680 to −939) and third (mean difference €−2298, 95%CI= −4092 to −1288) compared to the first dislocation. Conclusions: Nonoperative treatment of shoulder instability has substantial societal costs. Level of Evidence: III, economic analysis.
AB - Background: Shoulder instability is associated with decreased functioning. The associated costs could be substantial and interesting to clinicians, researchers, and policy makers. This prospective observational study aims to (1) estimate productivity losses and healthcare expenses following the nonoperative treatment of shoulder instability and (2) identify patient characteristics that influence societal costs. Methods: One hundred and thirty-two patients completed a questionnaire regarding production losses and healthcare utilization following consecutive episodes of shoulder instability. Productivity losses were calculated using the friction cost approach. Healthcare utilization was evaluated using standard costs. analysis of variance test was used to assess which patient characteristics are related to productivity losses and healthcare expenses. Societal costs were assessed using multilevel analyses. Bootstrapping was used to estimate statistical uncertainty. Results: Mean productivity losses are €1469, €881, and €728 and mean healthcare expenses are €3759, €3267, and €2424 per patient per dislocation for the first, second, and third dislocation. Productivity losses decrease significantly after the second (mean difference €−1969, 95%CI= −3680 to −939) and third (mean difference €−2298, 95%CI= −4092 to −1288) compared to the first dislocation. Conclusions: Nonoperative treatment of shoulder instability has substantial societal costs. Level of Evidence: III, economic analysis.
KW - absenteeism
KW - coping
KW - economic analysis
KW - shoulder instability
KW - societal costs
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075557845&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075557845&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85075557845&origin=inward
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573218773543
DO - https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573218773543
M3 - Article
C2 - 31316587
SN - 1758-5732
VL - 11
SP - 265
EP - 274
JO - Shoulder and elbow
JF - Shoulder and elbow
IS - 4
ER -