Early first-line treatment response and subsequent disability worsening in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis

Marcus W. Koch, Jop Mostert, Pavle Repovic, James D. Bowen, Jerry S. Wolinsky, Fred D. Lublin, Eva Strijbis, Gary Cutter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


Background and purpose: Treatment success in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is generally determined using relapse frequency and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity in the first 6 or 12 months on treatment. The association of these definitions of short-term treatment success with disability worsening and disease activity in the longer term is unclear. In this study, we investigated risk factors associated with early first-line treatment failure in RRMS, and the association of early treatment failure with subsequent disability worsening or "no evidence of disease activity" (NEDA-3) status. Methods: We used data from CombiRx (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00211887) to investigate risk factors associated with early treatment failure, and the association of early treatment failure at 6 and 12 months with subsequent disability worsening or NEDA-3 at 36 months. Results: CombiRx included 1008 treatment-naïve participants with RRMS, who were randomly assigned to treatment with glatiramer acetate, interferon beta, or the combination of both. Early treatment failure at 6 or 12 months by several definitions was associated with NEDA-3 failure at 36 months, but not with subsequent disability worsening at 36 months. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was the only baseline characteristic associated with the risk of disability worsening at 36 months. Approximately 70% of NEDA-3 failures occurred due to MRI activity, and <10% occurred due to EDSS worsening. Conclusions: Our investigation shows that current definitions of early treatment failure in RRMS are unrelated to patient-relevant disability worsening at 36 months of follow-up. Further research into useful definitions of treatment success and failure in RRMS is needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1106-1116
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean journal of neurology
Issue number4
Early online date2021
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2022


  • immunomodulatory treatment
  • outcome measures
  • relapsing–remitting MS
  • treatment
  • treatment response

Cite this