TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of eight-week online cognitive training in Parkinson's disease
T2 - A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
AU - van Balkom, Tim D.
AU - Berendse, Henk W.
AU - van der Werf, Ysbrand D.
AU - Twisk, Jos W. R.
AU - Peeters, Carel F. W.
AU - Hoogendoorn, Adriaan W.
AU - Hagen, Rob H.
AU - Berk, Tanja
AU - van den Heuvel, Odile A.
AU - Vriend, Chris
N1 - Funding Information: This study was supported by the Dutch Parkinson’s Disease Patient Association [grant number 2015-R04 ]; and the Netherlands Brain Foundation [grant number HA-2017-00227 ]. Funding Information: We would like to thank drs. A.C.M. Kramer, A.L. Schrijer BSc. drs. A.M. Ticheler, A. van Weert BSc. drs. B.E. Olgers, D.N. van Deursen BSc. drs. E. Koedijk, drs. E.L. Vester, D.W. van Wylick BSc. drs. L. Drost, drs. F. Kooij, I. Ashour BSc. drs. I. Zijlstra, J. Breunese BSc. drs. J.S.R. Biesbroeck, drs. J.P.A. van Dulm MD, drs. J.F. Stormmesand, drs. J.R.C. Verhaegh, K. Basant BSc. drs. M.J. Wagenmakers, mw. M.W. van der Wijk, drs. M.A. Laansma, M.M.A. Schyns BSc. drs. M. Rombouts, drs. M.G.M.S. Schokker, N.M.C. Samoei BSc. R.G.G. Busby BSc. drs. S. Kasprzak, and mw. V. Joosten, former interns at the department of Anatomy & Neurosciences of the Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, for their invaluable work on the data collection. We thank the COGTIPS user committee ? dr. J.L.W. Bosboom MD, dr. G.J. Geurtsen, drs. W.J. Oudegeest MD, and drs. E. van der Rhee ? for their advice and guidance in the execution and implementation of the trial. This study was supported by the Dutch Parkinson's Disease Patient Association [grant number 2015-R04]; and the Netherlands Brain Foundation [grant number HA-2017-00227]. Part of the participant recruitment was accomplished through Hersenonderzoek.nl, a Dutch online registry that facilitates participant recruitment for neuroscience studies (www.hersenonderzoek.nl). Hersenonderzoek.nl is funded by ZonMw-Memorabel (project no 73305095003), a project in the context of the Dutch Deltaplan Dementie, Gieskes-Strijbis Foundation, the Alzheimer's Society in the Netherlands and Brain Foundation Netherlands. Participants were additionally recruited through ParkinsonNEXT, a Dutch online registry that aims to unite patients, researchers and clinicians wanting to contribute to research and innovation in Parkinson's disease and Parkinsonism. ParkinsonNEXT produces information about ongoing studies and facilitates the recruitment of patients. Funding Information: Part of the participant recruitment was accomplished through Hersenonderzoek.nl, a Dutch online registry that facilitates participant recruitment for neuroscience studies ( www.hersenonderzoek.nl ). Hersenonderzoek.nl is funded by ZonMw-Memorabel (project no 73305095003 ), a project in the context of the Dutch Deltaplan Dementie, Gieskes-Strijbis Foundation, the Alzheimer's Society in the Netherlands and Brain Foundation Netherlands. Participants were additionally recruited through ParkinsonNEXT, a Dutch online registry that aims to unite patients, researchers and clinicians wanting to contribute to research and innovation in Parkinson's disease and Parkinsonism. ParkinsonNEXT produces information about ongoing studies and facilitates the recruitment of patients. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022/3/1
Y1 - 2022/3/1
N2 - Introduction: Cognitive training (CT) has been proposed as a treatment option for cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease (PD). We aimed to assess the efficacy of adaptive, computerized CT on cognitive function in PD. Methods: In this double-blind, randomized controlled trial we enrolled PD patients that experienced substantial subjective cognitive complaints. Over a period of eight weeks, participants underwent 24 sessions of computerized multi-domain CT or an active control intervention for 45 min each (randomized 1:1). The primary outcome was the accuracy on the Tower of London task; secondary outcomes included effects on other neuropsychological outcomes and subjective cognitive complaints. Outcomes were assessed before and after training and at six-months follow-up, and analyzed with multivariate mixed-model analyses. Results: The intention-to-treat population consisted of 136 participants (n = 68 vs. n = 68, age M: 62.9y, female: 39.7%). Multivariate mixed-model analyses showed no group difference on the Tower of London accuracy corrected for baseline performance (n = 130): B: −0.06, 95% CI: −0.27 to 0.15, p = 0.562. Participants in the CT group were on average 0.30 SD (i.e., 1.5 s) faster on difficulty load 4 of this task (secondary outcome): 95% CI: −0.55 to −0.06, p = 0.015. CT did not reduce subjective cognitive complaints. At follow-up, no group differences were found. Conclusions: This study shows no beneficial effect of eight-week computerized CT on the primary outcome (i.e., planning accuracy) and only minor improvements on secondary outcomes (i.e., processing speed) with limited clinical impact. Personalized or ecologically valid multi-modal intervention methods could be considered to achieve clinically meaningful and lasting effects.
AB - Introduction: Cognitive training (CT) has been proposed as a treatment option for cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease (PD). We aimed to assess the efficacy of adaptive, computerized CT on cognitive function in PD. Methods: In this double-blind, randomized controlled trial we enrolled PD patients that experienced substantial subjective cognitive complaints. Over a period of eight weeks, participants underwent 24 sessions of computerized multi-domain CT or an active control intervention for 45 min each (randomized 1:1). The primary outcome was the accuracy on the Tower of London task; secondary outcomes included effects on other neuropsychological outcomes and subjective cognitive complaints. Outcomes were assessed before and after training and at six-months follow-up, and analyzed with multivariate mixed-model analyses. Results: The intention-to-treat population consisted of 136 participants (n = 68 vs. n = 68, age M: 62.9y, female: 39.7%). Multivariate mixed-model analyses showed no group difference on the Tower of London accuracy corrected for baseline performance (n = 130): B: −0.06, 95% CI: −0.27 to 0.15, p = 0.562. Participants in the CT group were on average 0.30 SD (i.e., 1.5 s) faster on difficulty load 4 of this task (secondary outcome): 95% CI: −0.55 to −0.06, p = 0.015. CT did not reduce subjective cognitive complaints. At follow-up, no group differences were found. Conclusions: This study shows no beneficial effect of eight-week computerized CT on the primary outcome (i.e., planning accuracy) and only minor improvements on secondary outcomes (i.e., processing speed) with limited clinical impact. Personalized or ecologically valid multi-modal intervention methods could be considered to achieve clinically meaningful and lasting effects.
KW - Cognitive impairment
KW - Cognitive rehabilitation
KW - Cognitive training
KW - Dementia
KW - Parkinson's disease
KW - RCT
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125546462&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2022.02.018
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2022.02.018
M3 - Article
C2 - 35248830
SN - 1353-8020
VL - 96
SP - 80
EP - 87
JO - Parkinsonism and Related Disorders
JF - Parkinsonism and Related Disorders
ER -