TY - JOUR
T1 - Establishing irremediable psychiatric suffering in the context of medical assistance in dying in the Netherlands
T2 - a qualitative study
AU - van Veen, Sisco M. P.
AU - Ruissen, Andrea M.
AU - Beekman, Aartjan T. F.
AU - Evans, Natalie
AU - Widdershoven, Guy A. M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Canadian Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/4/4
Y1 - 2022/4/4
N2 - Background: Establishing irremediability of suffering is a central challenge in determining the appropriateness of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) for patients with a psychiatric disorder. We sought to evaluate how experienced psychiatrists define irremediable psychiatric suffering in the context of MAiD and what challenges they face while establishing irremediable psychiatric suffering. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study of psychiatrists in the Netherlands with experience assessing irremediable psychiatric suffering in the context of MAiD. We collected data from in-depth, semistructured interviews focused on the definition of irremediable psychiatric suffering and on the challenges in establishing irremediability. We analyzed themes using a modified grounded theory approach. Results: The study included 11 psychiatrists. Although irremediable psychiatric suffering is a prospective concept, most participants relied on retrospective dimensions to define it, such as a history of failed treatments, and expressed that uncertainty was inevitable in this process. When establishing irremediable psychiatric suffering, participants identified challenges related to diagnosis and treatment. The main diagnostic challenge identified was the frequent co-occurrence of more than 1 psychiatric diagnosis. Important challenges related to treatment included assessing the quality of past treatments, establishing when limits of treatment had been reached and managing "treatment fatigue.".
AB - Background: Establishing irremediability of suffering is a central challenge in determining the appropriateness of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) for patients with a psychiatric disorder. We sought to evaluate how experienced psychiatrists define irremediable psychiatric suffering in the context of MAiD and what challenges they face while establishing irremediable psychiatric suffering. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study of psychiatrists in the Netherlands with experience assessing irremediable psychiatric suffering in the context of MAiD. We collected data from in-depth, semistructured interviews focused on the definition of irremediable psychiatric suffering and on the challenges in establishing irremediability. We analyzed themes using a modified grounded theory approach. Results: The study included 11 psychiatrists. Although irremediable psychiatric suffering is a prospective concept, most participants relied on retrospective dimensions to define it, such as a history of failed treatments, and expressed that uncertainty was inevitable in this process. When establishing irremediable psychiatric suffering, participants identified challenges related to diagnosis and treatment. The main diagnostic challenge identified was the frequent co-occurrence of more than 1 psychiatric diagnosis. Important challenges related to treatment included assessing the quality of past treatments, establishing when limits of treatment had been reached and managing "treatment fatigue.".
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85127168452&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35273025
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127168452&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.210929
DO - https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.210929
M3 - Article
C2 - 35273025
SN - 0820-3946
VL - 194
SP - E485-E491
JO - CMAJ
JF - CMAJ
IS - 13
ER -