TY - JOUR
T1 - European Association of Urology (EAU) Prognostic Factor Risk Groups for Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Incorporating the WHO 2004/2016 and WHO 1973 Classification Systems for Grade
T2 - An Update from the EAU NMIBC Guidelines Panel[Formula presented]
AU - Sylvester, Richard J.
AU - Rodríguez, Oscar
AU - Hernández, Virginia
AU - Turturica, Diana
AU - Bauerová, Lenka
AU - Bruins, Harman Max
AU - Bründl, Johannes
AU - van der Kwast, Theo H.
AU - Brisuda, Antonin
AU - Rubio-Briones, José
AU - Seles, Maximilian
AU - Hentschel, Anouk E.
AU - Kusuma, Venkata R.M.
AU - Huebner, Nicolai
AU - Cotte, Juliette
AU - Mertens, Laura S.
AU - Volanis, Dimitrios
AU - Cussenot, Olivier
AU - Subiela Henríquez, Jose D.
AU - de la Peña, Enrique
AU - Pisano, Francesca
AU - Pešl, Michael
AU - van der Heijden, Antoine G.
AU - Herdegen, Sonja
AU - Zlotta, Alexandre R.
AU - Hacek, Jaromir
AU - Calatrava, Ana
AU - Mannweiler, Sebastian
AU - Bosschieter, Judith
AU - Ashabere, David
AU - Haitel, Andrea
AU - Côté, Jean François
AU - El Sheikh, Soha
AU - Lunelli, Luca
AU - Algaba, Ferran
AU - Alemany, Isabel
AU - Soria, Francesco
AU - Runneboom, Willemien
AU - Breyer, Johannes
AU - Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A.
AU - Llorente, Carlos
AU - Molinaro, Luca
AU - Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A.
AU - Evert, Matthias
AU - Kiemeney, Lambertus A.L.M.
AU - N'Dow, James
AU - Plass, Karin
AU - Čapoun, Otakar
AU - Soukup, Viktor
AU - Dominguez-Escrig, Jose L.
AU - Cohen, Daniel
AU - Palou, Joan
AU - Gontero, Paolo
AU - Burger, Maximilian
AU - Zigeuner, Richard
AU - Mostafid, Amir Hugh
AU - Shariat, Shahrokh F.
AU - Rouprêt, Morgan
AU - Compérat, Eva M.
AU - Babjuk, Marko
AU - van Rhijn, Bas W.G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 European Association of Urology Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Background: The European Association of Urology (EAU) prognostic factor risk groups for non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are used to provide recommendations for patient treatment after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). They do not, however, take into account the widely used World Health Organization (WHO) 2004/2016 grading classification and are based on patients treated in the 1980s. Objective: To update EAU prognostic factor risk groups using the WHO 1973 and 2004/2016 grading classifications and identify patients with the lowest and highest probabilities of progression. Design, setting, and participants: Individual patient data for primary NMIBC patients were collected from the institutions of the members of the EAU NMIBC guidelines panel. Intervention: Patients underwent TURBT followed by intravesical instillations at the physician's discretion. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models were fitted to the primary endpoint, the time to progression to muscle-invasive disease or distant metastases. Patients were divided into four risk groups: low-, intermediate-, high-, and a new, very high-risk group. The probabilities of progression were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Results and limitations: A total of 3401 patients treated with TURBT ± intravesical chemotherapy were included. From the multivariable analyses, tumor stage, WHO 1973/2004–2016 grade, concomitant carcinoma in situ, number of tumors, tumor size, and age were used to form four risk groups for which the probability of progression at 5 yr varied from <1% to >40%. Limitations include the retrospective collection of data and the lack of central pathology review. Conclusions: This study provides updated EAU prognostic factor risk groups that can be used to inform patient treatment and follow-up. Incorporating the WHO 2004/2016 and 1973 grading classifications, a new, very high-risk group has been identified for which urologists should be prompt to assess and adapt their therapeutic strategy when necessary. Patient summary: The newly updated European Association of Urology prognostic factor risk groups for non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer provide an improved basis for recommending a patient's treatment and follow-up schedule. The updated European Association of Urology prognostic factor risk groups for patients with non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer provide urologists with information that they should take into account when choosing a patient's treatment and scheduling follow-up.
AB - Background: The European Association of Urology (EAU) prognostic factor risk groups for non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are used to provide recommendations for patient treatment after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). They do not, however, take into account the widely used World Health Organization (WHO) 2004/2016 grading classification and are based on patients treated in the 1980s. Objective: To update EAU prognostic factor risk groups using the WHO 1973 and 2004/2016 grading classifications and identify patients with the lowest and highest probabilities of progression. Design, setting, and participants: Individual patient data for primary NMIBC patients were collected from the institutions of the members of the EAU NMIBC guidelines panel. Intervention: Patients underwent TURBT followed by intravesical instillations at the physician's discretion. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models were fitted to the primary endpoint, the time to progression to muscle-invasive disease or distant metastases. Patients were divided into four risk groups: low-, intermediate-, high-, and a new, very high-risk group. The probabilities of progression were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Results and limitations: A total of 3401 patients treated with TURBT ± intravesical chemotherapy were included. From the multivariable analyses, tumor stage, WHO 1973/2004–2016 grade, concomitant carcinoma in situ, number of tumors, tumor size, and age were used to form four risk groups for which the probability of progression at 5 yr varied from <1% to >40%. Limitations include the retrospective collection of data and the lack of central pathology review. Conclusions: This study provides updated EAU prognostic factor risk groups that can be used to inform patient treatment and follow-up. Incorporating the WHO 2004/2016 and 1973 grading classifications, a new, very high-risk group has been identified for which urologists should be prompt to assess and adapt their therapeutic strategy when necessary. Patient summary: The newly updated European Association of Urology prognostic factor risk groups for non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer provide an improved basis for recommending a patient's treatment and follow-up schedule. The updated European Association of Urology prognostic factor risk groups for patients with non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer provide urologists with information that they should take into account when choosing a patient's treatment and scheduling follow-up.
KW - Grade
KW - Guidelines
KW - Non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer
KW - Prognostic factors
KW - Progression
KW - Risk groups
KW - WHO 1973 2004/2016
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098983042&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.033
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.033
M3 - Article
C2 - 33419683
SN - 0302-2838
VL - 79
SP - 480
EP - 488
JO - European urology
JF - European urology
IS - 4
ER -