TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of a multidisciplinary treatment for patients with chronic non-specific upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders: a pilot study
AU - Schakenraad, C. H. A.
AU - Vendrig, L.
AU - Sluiter, J. K.
AU - Veenstra, W.
AU - Frings-Dresen, M. H. W.
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - Background Upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders (ULMSDs) are considered a major health and socio-economic problem. However, knowledge about the effect of treatment programmes is scarce. Objective To evaluate the effect of a multidisciplinary treatment programme on well-being, disability and return to work in patients with chronic non-specific upper-limb disorders. Methods A longitudinal and uncontrolled design with pre-post measurements was used. Forty-one patients on long-term sick leave attended for multidisciplinary treatment aimed at training in personal coping strategies and improving activities of daily living. Outcome measures were generic well-being (SF-36), disability (DASH) and return to work (working hours). Results General well-being improved significantly between pre-treatment and post-treatment. Level of disability declined significantly between pre-treatment and post-treatment. In 63% of the patients, return to own work was complete at follow up, 4 months post-treatment. Conclusion The results of this uncontrolled intervention study suggest that multidisciplinary treatment programmes improve general well-being, reduce disability and facilitate return to work in patients with chronic non-specific ULMSDs
AB - Background Upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders (ULMSDs) are considered a major health and socio-economic problem. However, knowledge about the effect of treatment programmes is scarce. Objective To evaluate the effect of a multidisciplinary treatment programme on well-being, disability and return to work in patients with chronic non-specific upper-limb disorders. Methods A longitudinal and uncontrolled design with pre-post measurements was used. Forty-one patients on long-term sick leave attended for multidisciplinary treatment aimed at training in personal coping strategies and improving activities of daily living. Outcome measures were generic well-being (SF-36), disability (DASH) and return to work (working hours). Results General well-being improved significantly between pre-treatment and post-treatment. Level of disability declined significantly between pre-treatment and post-treatment. In 63% of the patients, return to own work was complete at follow up, 4 months post-treatment. Conclusion The results of this uncontrolled intervention study suggest that multidisciplinary treatment programmes improve general well-being, reduce disability and facilitate return to work in patients with chronic non-specific ULMSDs
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqh105
DO - https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqh105
M3 - Article
C2 - 15576873
SN - 0962-7480
VL - 54
SP - 576
EP - 578
JO - Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)
JF - Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)
IS - 8
ER -