Screening for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in primary care using Holter monitoring and intermittent, ambulatory single-lead electrocardiography

Evert P. M. Karregat, Nicole Verbiest-van Gurp, Anne C. Bouwman, Steven B. Uittenbogaart, Jelle C. L. Himmelreich, Wim A. M. Lucassen, Sébastien P. J. Krul, Henri A. M. van Kesteren, Justin G. L. M. Luermans, Henk C. P. M. van Weert, Henri E. J. H. Stoffers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Timely detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) is important because of its increased risk of thrombo-embolic events. Single time point screening interventions fall short in detection of paroxysmal AF, which requires prolonged electrocardiographic monitoring, usually using a Holter. However, traditional 24-48 h Holter monitoring is less appropriate for screening purposes because of its low diagnostic yield. Intermittent, ambulatory screening using a single-lead electrocardiogram (1 L-ECG) device can offer a more efficient alternative. Methods: Primary care patients of ≥65 years participated in an opportunistic screening study for AF. We invited patients with a negative 12 L-ECG to wear a Holter monitor for two weeks and to use a MyDiagnostick 1 L-ECG device thrice daily. We report the yield of paroxysmal AF found by Holter monitoring and calculate the diagnostic accuracy of the 1 L-ECG device's built-in AF detection algorithm with the Holter monitor as reference standard. Results: We included 270 patients, of whom four had AF in a median of 8.0 days of Holter monitoring, a diagnostic yield of 1.5% (95%-CI: 0.4–3.8%). In 205 patients we performed simultaneous 1 L-ECG screening. For diagnosing AF based on the 1 L-ECG device's AF detection algorithm, sensitivity was 66.7% (95%-CI: 9.4–99.2%), specificity 68.8% (95%-CI: 61.9–75.1%), positive predictive value 3.1% (95%-CI: 1.4–6.8%) and negative predictive value 99.3% (95%-CI: 96.6–99.9%). Conclusion: We found a low diagnostic yield of paroxysmal AF using Holter monitoring in elderly primary care patients with a negative 12 L-ECG. The diagnostic accuracy of an intermittently, ambulatory used MyDiagnostick 1 L-ECG device as interpreted by its built-in AF detection algorithm is limited.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-46
Number of pages6
JournalInternational journal of cardiology
Volume345
Early online date2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2021

Keywords

  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Diagnostic accuracy
  • Electrocardiography
  • Holter monitoring
  • Prevalence
  • Screening

Cite this