Factors associating with differences in the incidence of renal replacement therapy among elderly: Data from the ERA-EDTA Registry

Jaakko Helve, Anneke Kramer, Jose M. Abad-Diez, Cecile Couchoud, Gabriel de Arriba, Johan de Meester, Marie Evans, Florence Glaudet, Carola Grönhagen-Riska, James G. Heaf, Visnja Lezaic, Maurizio Nordio, Runolfur Palsson, Ülle Pechter, Halima Resic, Rafael Santamaria, Carmen Santiuste de Pablos, Ziad A. Massy, Óscar Zurriaga, Kitty J. JagerPatrik Finne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background. The incidence of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in the general population 75 years of age varies considerably between countries and regions in Europe. Our aim was to study characteristics and survival of elderly RRT patients and to find explanations for differences in RRT incidence. Methods. Patients 75 years of age at the onset of RRT in 2010-2013 from 29 national or regional registries providing data to the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry were included. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to assess variation in patient characteristics and linear regression was used to study the association between RRT incidence and various factors. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were employed for survival analyses. Results. The mean annual incidence of RRT in the age group 75 years of age ranged from 157 to 924 per million age-related population. The median age at the start of RRT was higher and comorbidities were less common in areas with higher RRT incidence, but overall the association between patient characteristics and RRT incidence was weak. The unadjusted survival was lower in high-incidence areas due to an older age at onset of RRT, but the adjusted survival was similar [relative risk 1.00 (95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.03)] in patients from low- and high-incidence areas. Conclusions. Variation in the incidence of RRT among the elderly across European countries and regions is remarkable and could not be explained by the available data. However, the survival of patients in low- and high-incidence areas was remarkably similar.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1428-1435
JournalNephrology, dialysis, transplantation
Volume33
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Cite this