Factor's that impact on women's decision-making around prenatal genomic tests: An international discrete choice survey

James Buchanan, Melissa Hill, Caroline M. Vass, Jennifer Hammond, Sam Riedijk, Jasmijn E. Klapwijk, Eleanor Harding, Stina Lou, Ida Vogel, Lisa Hui, Charlotta Ingvoldstad-Malmgren, Maria Johansson Soller, Kelly E. Ormond, Mahesh Choolani, Qian Zheng, Lyn S. Chitty, Celine Lewis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)


Objective: We conducted a survey-based discrete-choice experiment (DCE) to understand the test features that drive women's preferences for prenatal genomic testing, and explore variation across countries. Methods: Five test attributes were identified as being important for decision-making through a literature review, qualitative interviews and quantitative scoring exercise. Twelve scenarios were constructed in which respondents choose between two invasive tests or no test. Women from eight countries who delivered a baby in the previous 24 months completed a DCE presenting these scenarios. Choices were modeled using conditional logit regression analysis. Results: Surveys from 1239 women (Australia: n = 178; China: n = 179; Denmark: n = 88; Netherlands: n = 177; Singapore: n = 90; Sweden: n = 178; UK: n = 174; USA: n = 175) were analyzed. The key attribute affecting preferences was a test with the highest diagnostic yield (p < 0.01). Women preferred tests with short turnaround times (p < 0.01), and tests reporting variants of uncertain significance (VUS; p < 0.01) and secondary findings (SFs; p < 0.01). Several country-specific differences were identified, including time to get a result, who explains the result, and the return of VUS and SFs. Conclusion: Most women want maximum information from prenatal genomic tests, but our findings highlight country-based differences. Global consensus on how to return uncertain results is not necessarily realistic or desirable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)934-946
Number of pages13
JournalPrenatal diagnosis
Issue number7
Early online date2022
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2022

Cite this