Follow-up, treatment, and reinfection rates among asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis cases in general practice

I.G.M. van Valkengoed, S.A. Morre, A.J.C. van den Brule, C.J.L.M. Meijer, L.M. Bouter, J.T.M. van Eijk, A.J.P. Boeke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adequate treatment and follow-up of patients is essential to the success of a screening programme for Chlamydia trachomatis. There has been a lack of data on follow-up, confirmation of infections, and reinfection rates among asymptomatic patients in general practice. AIM: 7b study the rates of diagnostic confirmation of C trachomatis infection, successful treatment, and reinfection one year after cases were detected in a screening programme for asymptomatic infections. DESIGN OF STUDY: Prospective cohort study SETTING: Fifteen general practices in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. METHOD: One hundred and twenty-four patients with asymptomatic C trachomatis infections were requested to provide a cervical or urethral swab and a urine specimen, for the purpose of diagnostic confirmation before being treated. One year after the first screening, all of the patients were invited for a second screening. All samples were tested using the ligase chain reaction (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, USA). RESULTS: Out of 124 patients, 110 (89%) attended the scheduled appointment for diagnostic confirmation and treatment; 92 (84%) of them were confirmed to be positive and received treatment. At the second screening a year later, none of the 56 patients who had received treatment and who had been screened a second time were reinfected. CONCLUSION: No asymptomatic patients werefound to have reinfections with C trachomatis one year after diagnostic confirmation and treatment. This underlines the effectiveness of the screening and treatment strategy
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)623-627
Number of pages5
JournalBritish journal of general practice
Volume52
Issue number481
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Cite this