For debate: Is mild cognitive impairment a clinically useful concept?

David Ames; Ronald C. Petersen; David S. Knopman; Pieter Jelle Visser; Henry Brodaty

doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610206003929

For debate: Is mild cognitive impairment a clinically useful concept?

David Ames, Ronald C. Petersen, David S. Knopman, Pieter Jelle Visser, Henry Brodaty

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › Academic › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	393-409
Number of pages	17
Journal	International psychogeriatrics
Volume	18
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610206003929
Publication status	Published - 1 Aug 2006

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610206003929

Cite this

@article{2787cc35920a45c0884e187f226ab392,

title = "For debate: Is mild cognitive impairment a clinically useful concept?",

author = "David Ames and Petersen, {Ronald C.} and Knopman, {David S.} and Visser, {Pieter Jelle} and Henry Brodaty",

year = "2006",

month = aug,

day = "1",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610206003929",

language = "English",

volume = "18",

pages = "393--409",

journal = "Psychogeriatrics",

issn = "1346-3500",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - For debate

T2 - Is mild cognitive impairment a clinically useful concept?

AU - Ames, David

AU - Petersen, Ronald C.

AU - Knopman, David S.

AU - Visser, Pieter Jelle

AU - Brodaty, Henry

PY - 2006/8/1

Y1 - 2006/8/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746396614&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610206003929

DO - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610206003929

M3 - Review article

SN - 1346-3500

VL - 18

SP - 393

EP - 409

JO - Psychogeriatrics

JF - Psychogeriatrics

IS - 3

ER -

For debate: Is mild cognitive impairment a clinically useful concept?

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this