TY - JOUR
T1 - Frequency of monitoring diabetes in primary care
T2 - What do well-controlled patients prefer?
AU - Wermeling, Paulien R.
AU - van den Donk, Maureen
AU - Gorter, Kees J.
AU - Beulens, Joline W.J.
AU - Rutten, Guy E.H.M.
PY - 2012/8
Y1 - 2012/8
N2 - Objective: To describe the preferences and the associated patients' characteristics of well-controlled type 2 diabetes patients for the diabetes monitoring frequency in primary care. Methods: Cross-sectional study with 233 participating general practitioners across the Netherlands. Eligible patients were between 40 and 80 years, diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for more than 1 year not on insulin, and with glycated hemoglobin (A1C) ≤7.5%, systolic blood pressure ≤145 mm Hg and total cholesterol ≤5.2 mmol/L. Participants were asked whether they had a preference for 3-monthly or 6-monthly monitoring or no preference. Results: From 2215 patients, 747 patients (33.7%) preferred 3-monthly and 677 (30.6%) 6-monthly monitoring by either the general practitioner or the practice nurse. The former group consisted of less smokers, felt less healthy, reported more diabetes-related distress, had the highest reported frequency of hyperglycemic episodes and used more oral blood glucose lowering drugs compared to the other patients. Those preferring 6-monthly monitoring were least satisfied with diabetes treatment, reported the lowest frequency of hyperglycemic episodes and used less oral blood glucose lowering drugs compared to the other patients. Conclusion: A preference for more frequent monitoring was associated with a worse disease status, whereas a preference for less frequent monitoring tended to be associated with the opposite. Patients seem to have logical preferences that need to be accounted for in diabetes care.
AB - Objective: To describe the preferences and the associated patients' characteristics of well-controlled type 2 diabetes patients for the diabetes monitoring frequency in primary care. Methods: Cross-sectional study with 233 participating general practitioners across the Netherlands. Eligible patients were between 40 and 80 years, diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for more than 1 year not on insulin, and with glycated hemoglobin (A1C) ≤7.5%, systolic blood pressure ≤145 mm Hg and total cholesterol ≤5.2 mmol/L. Participants were asked whether they had a preference for 3-monthly or 6-monthly monitoring or no preference. Results: From 2215 patients, 747 patients (33.7%) preferred 3-monthly and 677 (30.6%) 6-monthly monitoring by either the general practitioner or the practice nurse. The former group consisted of less smokers, felt less healthy, reported more diabetes-related distress, had the highest reported frequency of hyperglycemic episodes and used more oral blood glucose lowering drugs compared to the other patients. Those preferring 6-monthly monitoring were least satisfied with diabetes treatment, reported the lowest frequency of hyperglycemic episodes and used less oral blood glucose lowering drugs compared to the other patients. Conclusion: A preference for more frequent monitoring was associated with a worse disease status, whereas a preference for less frequent monitoring tended to be associated with the opposite. Patients seem to have logical preferences that need to be accounted for in diabetes care.
KW - Diabetes mellitus type 2
KW - General practitioners
KW - Monitoring frequency
KW - Patient preference
KW - Primary health care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872503184&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2012.07.012
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2012.07.012
M3 - Article
SN - 1499-2671
VL - 36
SP - 187
EP - 192
JO - Canadian Journal of Diabetes
JF - Canadian Journal of Diabetes
IS - 4
ER -