TY - JOUR
T1 - Front-of-neck airway rescue with impalpable anatomy during a simulated cannot intubate cannot oxygenate scenario: scalpel–finger–cannula versus scalpel–finger–bougie in a sheep model
AU - study collaborators
AU - Heard, Andrew
AU - Gordon, Helen
AU - Douglas, Scott
AU - Grainger, Nicholas
AU - Avis, Hans
AU - Vlaskovsky, Philip
AU - Toner, Andrew
AU - Thomas, Betty
AU - Kennedy, Chris
AU - Perlman, Hannah
AU - Fox, Joanna
AU - Tarrant, Kelly
AU - de Silva, Natasha
AU - Eakins, Patrick
AU - Patel, Prabir
AU - Fitzpatrick, Samuel
AU - Bright, Shona
AU - O'Keefe, Sinead
AU - Do, Thy
AU - Staff, Veterinary
PY - 2020/8
Y1 - 2020/8
N2 - Background: Front-of-neck airway rescue in a cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate (CICO) scenario with impalpable anatomy is particularly challenging. Several techniques have been described based on a midline vertical neck incision with subsequent finger dissection, followed by either a cannula or scalpel puncture of the now palpated airway. We explored whether the speed of rescue oxygenation differs between these techniques. Methods: In a high-fidelity simulation of a CICO scenario in anaesthetised Merino sheep with impalpable front-of-neck anatomy, 35 consecutive eligible participants undergoing airway training performed scalpel–finger–cannula and scalpel–finger–bougie in a random order. The primary outcome was time from airway palpation to first oxygen delivery. Data, were analysed with Cox proportional hazards. Results: Scalpel–finger–cannula was associated with shorter time to first oxygen delivery on univariate (hazard ratio [HR]=11.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.14–25.13; P<0.001) and multivariate (HR=8.87; 95% CI, 4.31–18.18; P<0.001) analyses. In the multivariable model, consultant grade was also associated with quicker first oxygen delivery compared with registrar grade (HR=3.28; 95% CI, 1.36–7.95; P=0.008). With scalpel–finger–cannula, successful oxygen delivery within 3 min of CICO declaration and ≤2 attempts was more frequent; 97% vs 63%, P<0.001. In analyses of successful cases only, scalpel–finger–cannula resulted in earlier improvement in arterial oxygen saturations (–25 s; 95% CI, –35 to –15; P<0.001), but a longer time to first capnography reading (+89 s; 95% CI, 69 to 110; P<0.001). No major complications occurred in either arm. Conclusions: The scalpel–finger–cannula technique was associated with superior oxygen delivery performance during a simulated CICO scenario in sheep with impalpable front-of-neck anatomy.
AB - Background: Front-of-neck airway rescue in a cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate (CICO) scenario with impalpable anatomy is particularly challenging. Several techniques have been described based on a midline vertical neck incision with subsequent finger dissection, followed by either a cannula or scalpel puncture of the now palpated airway. We explored whether the speed of rescue oxygenation differs between these techniques. Methods: In a high-fidelity simulation of a CICO scenario in anaesthetised Merino sheep with impalpable front-of-neck anatomy, 35 consecutive eligible participants undergoing airway training performed scalpel–finger–cannula and scalpel–finger–bougie in a random order. The primary outcome was time from airway palpation to first oxygen delivery. Data, were analysed with Cox proportional hazards. Results: Scalpel–finger–cannula was associated with shorter time to first oxygen delivery on univariate (hazard ratio [HR]=11.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.14–25.13; P<0.001) and multivariate (HR=8.87; 95% CI, 4.31–18.18; P<0.001) analyses. In the multivariable model, consultant grade was also associated with quicker first oxygen delivery compared with registrar grade (HR=3.28; 95% CI, 1.36–7.95; P=0.008). With scalpel–finger–cannula, successful oxygen delivery within 3 min of CICO declaration and ≤2 attempts was more frequent; 97% vs 63%, P<0.001. In analyses of successful cases only, scalpel–finger–cannula resulted in earlier improvement in arterial oxygen saturations (–25 s; 95% CI, –35 to –15; P<0.001), but a longer time to first capnography reading (+89 s; 95% CI, 69 to 110; P<0.001). No major complications occurred in either arm. Conclusions: The scalpel–finger–cannula technique was associated with superior oxygen delivery performance during a simulated CICO scenario in sheep with impalpable front-of-neck anatomy.
KW - airway management
KW - cannot intubate cannot oxygenate
KW - emergency front-of-neck airway
KW - oxygen delivery
KW - scalpel finger bougie
KW - scalpel finger cannula
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085291708&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.04.067
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.04.067
M3 - Article
C2 - 32466843
SN - 0007-0912
VL - 125
SP - 184
EP - 191
JO - British Journal of Anaesthesia
JF - British Journal of Anaesthesia
IS - 2
ER -