TY - JOUR
T1 - Gastric deformation models for adaptive radiotherapy
T2 - Personalized vs population-based strategy
AU - Bleeker, Margot
AU - Hulshof, Maarten C. C. M.
AU - Bel, Arjan
AU - Sonke, Jan-Jakob
AU - van der Horst, Astrid
N1 - Funding Information: This work was funded by the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF Kankerbestrijding; Grant No. KWF 10882). Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors
PY - 2022/1/1
Y1 - 2022/1/1
N2 - Background and purpose: To create a library of plans (LoP) for gastric cancer adaptive radiotherapy, accurate predictions of shape changes due to filling variations are essential. The ability of two strategies (personalized and population-based) to predict stomach shape based on filling was evaluated for volunteer and patient data to explore the potential for use in a LoP. Materials and methods: For 19 healthy volunteers, stomachs were delineated on MRIs with empty (ES), half-full (HFS) and full stomach (FS). For the personalized strategy, a deformation vector field from HFS to corresponding ES was acquired and extrapolated to predict FS. For the population-based strategy, the average deformation vectors from HFS to FS of 18 volunteers were applied to the HFS of the remaining volunteer to predict FS (leave-one-out principle); thus, predictions were made for each volunteer. Reversed processes were performed to predict ES. To validate, for seven gastric cancer patients, the volunteer population-based model was applied to their pre-treatment CT to predict stomach shape on 2–3 repeat CTs. For all predictions, volume was made equal to true stomach volume. Results: FS predictions were satisfactory, with median Dice similarity coefficient (mDSC) of 0.91 (population-based) and 0.89 (personalized). ES predictions were poorer: mDSC = 0.82 for population-based; personalized strategy yielded unachievable volumes. Population-based shape predictions (both ES and FS) were comparable between patients (mDSC = 0.87) and volunteers (0.88). Conclusion: The population-based model outperformed the personalized model and demonstrated its ability in predicting filling-dependent stomach shape changes and, therefore, its potential for use in a gastric cancer LoP.
AB - Background and purpose: To create a library of plans (LoP) for gastric cancer adaptive radiotherapy, accurate predictions of shape changes due to filling variations are essential. The ability of two strategies (personalized and population-based) to predict stomach shape based on filling was evaluated for volunteer and patient data to explore the potential for use in a LoP. Materials and methods: For 19 healthy volunteers, stomachs were delineated on MRIs with empty (ES), half-full (HFS) and full stomach (FS). For the personalized strategy, a deformation vector field from HFS to corresponding ES was acquired and extrapolated to predict FS. For the population-based strategy, the average deformation vectors from HFS to FS of 18 volunteers were applied to the HFS of the remaining volunteer to predict FS (leave-one-out principle); thus, predictions were made for each volunteer. Reversed processes were performed to predict ES. To validate, for seven gastric cancer patients, the volunteer population-based model was applied to their pre-treatment CT to predict stomach shape on 2–3 repeat CTs. For all predictions, volume was made equal to true stomach volume. Results: FS predictions were satisfactory, with median Dice similarity coefficient (mDSC) of 0.91 (population-based) and 0.89 (personalized). ES predictions were poorer: mDSC = 0.82 for population-based; personalized strategy yielded unachievable volumes. Population-based shape predictions (both ES and FS) were comparable between patients (mDSC = 0.87) and volunteers (0.88). Conclusion: The population-based model outperformed the personalized model and demonstrated its ability in predicting filling-dependent stomach shape changes and, therefore, its potential for use in a gastric cancer LoP.
KW - Adaptive radiotherapy
KW - Deformation model
KW - Gastric cancer
KW - Library of plans
KW - Shape prediction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120948017&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2021.11.028
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2021.11.028
M3 - Article
C2 - 34861269
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 166
SP - 126
EP - 132
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
ER -